On the minimization of different sources of error for an RTT-based indoor localization system without any calibration stage

Prior to the trilateration process, different sources of error disturb the range estimates in any localization system, especially in dense cluttered environments where the non-line-of-sight (NLOS) between the mobile user (MU) and the access points (AP) becomes the main problem. Common error mitigation approaches are based on linear or Gaussian assumptions that are not fulfilled in this kind of scenarios, such as indoor or dense urban outdoor areas. This paper points out the better performance of a round-trip time (RTT)-based localization system when combining a prior NLOS measurements correction (PNMC) method with particle RTT-only tracking, since hard decisions are only made in the last stage of the positioning process, and neither linear nor Gaussian models are assumed. The final performance leads to a reduction of more than 57% of the error obtained without any mitigation technique, keeping the requirement of no calibration stage.

[1]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[2]  Axel Küpper.  Location-based Services: Fundamentals and Operation , 2005 .

[3]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Fundamental Limits of Wideband Localization Accuracy via Fisher Information , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Particle filters for positioning, navigation, and tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Evaristo J. Abril,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION AND MITIGATION OF RANGE ESTIMATION ERRORS FOR AN RTT-BASED IEEE 802.11 INDOOR LOCATION SYSTEM , 2009 .

[6]  Santiago Mazuelas,et al.  Prior NLOS Measurement Correction for Positioning in Cellular Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Analysis of wireless geolocation in a non-line-of-sight environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Harri Saarnisaari,et al.  Systematic Errors and Location Accuracy in Wireless Networks , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  Santiago Mazuelas,et al.  NLOS Mitigation Prior to Range Estimation Smoothing for Wireless Location Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[10]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Beyond the Kalman Filter: Particle Filters for Tracking Applications , 2004 .

[11]  Santiago Mazuelas,et al.  Adding indoor location capabilities to an IEEE 802.11 WLAN using real-time RTT measurements , 2009, 2009 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium.

[12]  Santiago Mazuelas,et al.  Accurate and Integrated Localization System for Indoor Environments Based on IEEE 802.11 Round-Trip Time Measurements , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[13]  J. J. Caffery,et al.  A new approach to the geometry of TOA location , 2000, Vehicular Technology Conference Fall 2000. IEEE VTS Fall VTC2000. 52nd Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37152).

[14]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Time of Arrival Estimation for UWB Localizers in Realistic Environments , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  A Novel Efficient Cluster-Based MLSE Equalizer for Satellite Communication Channels with-QAM Signaling , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..