A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Hainan Island’s 2010–2020 Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting

Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) is a single currency to measure the contribution of an ecosystem to society. It is the sum of the value of products and services provided by the ecosystem to humans. Based on this, GEP characterizes the current situation of the ecological environment in a region and can measure the contribution index provided by ecosystems. Based on land use data, rainfall data, soil data, statistical yearbook, DEM and other data, this paper constructs the accounting framework of Hainan Island’s GEP, quantitatively evaluates Hainan Island’s GEP from 2010 to 2020 and analyzes the research results. The results are as follows: (1) The GEP of Hainan Island’s ecosystem rose from 596.404 billion CNY in 2010 to 1032.096 billion CNY in 2020, an increase of about 42.21% with an average annual growth rate of 6.3%. The overall GEP has shown an upward trend. Among them, the value of regulation service accounts for the largest proportion was up to 73–83%. (2) The overall distribution of GEP in Hainan Island is uneven, decreasing from the central mountainous areas to the eastern coastal areas around to the west. In particular, Danzhou City, Wenchang City and Haikou City have higher values, while Tunchang, Baoting County and Wuzhishan City have lower values, and Wuzhishan City has the lowest values. Hainan Island is rich in natural resources, which contain great value. Through the accounting of GEP, we can clearly determine the value of the ecosystem, which can help the relevant departments estimate the GEP of Hainan Island’s ecosystem. It can provide a reference for Hainan to formulate ecological protection and sustainable development policies, and for the GEP estimation of other islands.

[1]  Linbo Zhang,et al.  A critical review of Gross ecosystem product accounting in China: Status quo, problems and future directions. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Quanxi Wang,et al.  Spatial–Temporal Variations of Water Ecosystem Services Value and Its Influencing Factors: A Case in Typical Regions of the Central Loess Plateau , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  Chaozhi Hao,et al.  Basic Principles of Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) Accounting , 2022, Journal of Resources and Ecology.

[4]  Long Liang,et al.  Measuring gross ecosystem product of nine cities within the Pearl River Delta of China , 2021 .

[5]  Z. Ouyang,et al.  Valuing natural capital amidst rapid urbanization: assessing the gross ecosystem product (GEP) of China’s ‘Chang-Zhu-Tan’ megacity , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[6]  Tong Li,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in gross primary productivity simulated by light use efficiency models: Model structure, parameters, input data, and spatial resolution , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[7]  Adam P. Hejnowicz,et al.  The Value Landscape in Ecosystem Services: Value, Value Wherefore Art Thou Value? , 2017 .

[8]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[9]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The ancient forests of La Gomera, Canary Islands, and their sensitivity to environmental change , 2013 .

[10]  Ge Chen,et al.  Emergy-based ecological account for the Chinese economy in 2004 , 2008 .

[11]  Richard B. Howarth,et al.  Accounting for the value of ecosystem services , 2002 .

[12]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services , 2000 .

[13]  James T. Hollibaugh,et al.  Annual cycle and interannual variability of ecosystem metabolism in a temperate climate embayment , 1997 .

[14]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[15]  耿静,徐栋,吴御豪,耿佳,任丙南,杨锋 GENG Jing Spatio-temporal evolution of eco-environment quality and the response to climate change and human activities in Hainan Island , 2022, Acta Ecologica Sinica.

[16]  韩宝龙,欧阳志云 HAN Baolong The comparing and applying Intelligent Urban Ecosystem Management System (IUEMS) on ecosystem services assessment , 2021, Acta Ecologica Sinica.

[17]  耿静,任丙南 Geng Jing Application of the gross ecosystem product accounting theory on rural ecological civilization assessment in Hainan Province: A case study of Wenmen Village in Sanya , 2020 .

[18]  欧阳志云 Ouyang Zhiyun,et al.  Gross ecosystem product accounting for the Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture , 2017 .

[19]  李晓波 Li Xiaobo,et al.  Study on accounting of Gross Ecosystem Product based on emergy analysis and ecological land classification in China , 2016 .

[20]  江波 Jiang Bo,et al.  Status and dynamics of China's lake water regulation , 2014 .

[21]  Zhao Dongsheng The Indirect Value of Ecosystem Services in the Three-River Headwaters Region , 2013 .

[22]  张艳 Zhang Yan,et al.  Gross ecosystem product:concept, accounting framework and case study , 2013 .

[23]  H. Bing Temporal and spatial variations of rainfall erosivity in China during 1960 to 2009 , 2013 .

[24]  C. Beijing Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services Value in China , 2011 .

[25]  Duan Zheng,et al.  Estimation of the cover and management factor for modeling soil erosion using remote sensing. , 2009 .

[26]  Chen Cao,et al.  Expert Knowledge Based Valuation Method of Ecosystem Services in China , 2008 .

[27]  Wang Chun-gang Calculation of rainfall erosivity by using hourly rainfall data , 2007 .

[28]  Z. Wen RAINFALL EROSIVITY ESTIMATION UNDER DIFFERENT RAINFALL AMOUNT , 2003 .

[29]  Xiao Han,et al.  The spatial distribution characteristics and eco economic value of soil conservation service of ecosystems in Hainan Island by GIS , 2000 .