A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients

Background: A new commercially available optical low coherence reflectometry device (Lenstar, Haag-Streit or Allegro Biograph, Wavelight) provides high-resolution non-contact measurements of ocular biometry. The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements compared with current clinical instrumentation. Method: Measurements were taken with the LenStar and IOLMaster on 112 patients aged 41–96 years listed for cataract surgery. A subgroup of 21 patients also had A-scan applanation ultrasonography (OcuScan) performed. Intersession repeatability of the LenStar measurements was assessed on 32 patients Results: LenStar measurements of white-to-white were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference 0.06 (SD 0.03) D; p = 0.305); corneal curvature measurements were similar to the IOLMaster (average difference −0.04 (0.20) D; p = 0.240); anterior chamber depth measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.10 (0.40) mm) and ultrasound (by 0.32 (0.62) mm; p<0.001); crystalline lens thickness measurements were similar to ultrasound (difference 0.16 (0.83) mm, p = 0.382); axial length measurements were significantly longer than the IOLMaster (by 0.01 (0.02) mm) but shorter than ultrasound (by 0.14 (0.15) mm; p<0.001). The LensStar was unable to take measurements due to dense media opacities in a similar number of patients to the IOLMaster (9–10%). The LenStar biometric measurements were found to be highly repeatable (variability ⩽2% of average value). Conclusions: Although there were some statistical differences between ocular biometry measurements between the LenStar and current clinical instruments, they were not clinically significant. LenStar measurements were highly repeatable and the instrument easy to use.

[1]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[2]  C. O'brien,et al.  The reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements , 1991, Eye.

[3]  Frank Krummenauer,et al.  Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  R. Hoffman,et al.  Immersion A‐scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: Outcomes analysis , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  A. Watson,et al.  Measurement of axial length in the calculation of intraocular lens power , 1998, Eye.

[6]  H. Eleftheriadis IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. Gills,et al.  Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[9]  A. Fercher,et al.  Eye-length measurement by interferometry with partially coherent light. , 1988, Optics letters.

[10]  M. Parravano,et al.  Reliability of the IOLMaster in axial length evaluation in silicone oil-filled eyes , 2007, Eye.

[11]  Chrisroph K. Hirzenberger Optical Measurement of the Axial Eye Length by Laser Doppler Interferometry , 2005 .

[12]  A. Lam,et al.  The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster™ * , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  P. Finn,et al.  Comparative estimation of anterior chamber depth by ultrasonography, Orbscan II, and IOLMaster , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  C K Hitzenberger,et al.  Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  W. Hill,et al.  Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  B. Dick,et al.  Evaluation of the practicality of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound in 253 eyes , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  János Németh,et al.  Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  J. Storey,et al.  ULTRASOUND—A RESEARCH TOOL IN THE STUDY OF ACCOMMODATION * , 1983, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  Loreto V T Rose,et al.  Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A‐scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Gale,et al.  National Biometry Audit , 2004, Eye.

[22]  Sverker Norrby,et al.  Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.