Measles Virus Contact with T Cells Impedes Cytoskeletal Remodeling Associated with Spreading, Polarization, and CD3 Clustering

CD3/CD28‐induced activation of the PI3/Akt kinase pathway and proliferation is impaired in T cells after contact with the measles virus (MV) glycoprotein (gp) complex. We now show that this signal also impairs actin cytoskeletal remodeling in T cells, which loose their ability to adhere and to promote microvilli formation. MV exposure results in an almost complete collapse of membrane protrusions associated with reduced phosphorylation levels of cofilin and ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins. Consistent with their inability to activate Cdc42 and Rac1 in response to the ligation of CD3/CD28, T cells exposed to MV fail to acquire a morphology consistent with spreading and lamellopodia formation. In spite of these impairments of cytoskeleton‐driven morphological alterations, these cells are recruited into conjugates with dendritic cells as efficiently as control T cells. The signal elicited by MV, however, prevents T cells to polarize as documented by a failure to redistribute the microtubule organizing center toward the synapse. Moreover, CD3 cannot be efficiently clustered and redistributed to the central region of the immunological synapse. Thus, by inducing microvillar collapse and interfering with cytoskeletal remodeling, MV signaling disturbs the ability of T cells to adhere, spread, and cluster receptors essential for sustained T‐cell activation.

[1]  T. Hara,et al.  Roles of p-ERM and Rho–ROCK signaling in lymphocyte polarity and uropod formation , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  P. Hordijk,et al.  Rac1 Mediates Collapse of Microvilli on Chemokine-Activated T Lymphocytes , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  S. Schneider‐Schaulies,et al.  Measles Virus Interacts with and Alters Signal Transduction in T-Cell Lipid Rafts , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[4]  Wilhelm Friedrich,et al.  Lymphocyte microvilli are dynamic, actin-dependent structures that do not require Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) for their morphology , 2004 .

[5]  A. Trautmann,et al.  ERM proteins regulate cytoskeleton relaxation promoting T cell–APC conjugation , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[6]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Calcineurin imposes T cell unresponsiveness through targeted proteolysis of signaling proteins , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[7]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Role of the cytoskeleton during leukocyte responses , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[8]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Chemokine stimulation of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes induces rapid dephosphorylation of ERM proteins, which facilitates loss of microvilli and polarization. , 2003, Blood.

[9]  H. Yin,et al.  Regulation of Sustained Actin Dynamics by the TCR and Costimulation as a Mechanism of Receptor Localization , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  G. Nebl,et al.  Interaction of cofilin with the serine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A in normal and neoplastic human T lymphocytes. , 2003, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[11]  N. Burroughs,et al.  Interface accumulation of receptor/ligand couples in lymphocyte activation: methods, mechanisms, and significance , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[12]  J. Madrenas,et al.  Clustering of a lipid-raft associated pool of ERM proteins at the immunological synapse upon T cell receptor or CD28 ligation. , 2002, Immunology letters.

[13]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Measles virus: immunomodulation and cell tropism as pathogenicity determinants , 2002, Medical Microbiology and Immunology.

[14]  A. Bretscher,et al.  ERM proteins and merlin: integrators at the cell cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  C. Echeverri,et al.  Function of dynein and dynactin in herpes simplex virus capsid transport. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[16]  M. Nishita,et al.  Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1α Activates LIM Kinase 1 and Induces Cofilin Phosphorylation for T-Cell Chemotaxis , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Regulation of gene expression in lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells by measles virus: consequences for immunomodulation , 2002, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[18]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Cutting Edge: Negative Regulation of Immune Synapse Formation by Anchoring Lipid Raft to Cytoskeleton Through Cbp-EBP50-ERM Assembly1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  C. Rabourdin-Combe,et al.  CD46/CD3 Costimulation Induces Morphological Changes of Human T Cells and Activation of Vav, Rac, and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[20]  P. Lamy,et al.  Measles virus exploits dendritic cells to suppress CD4+ T-cell proliferation via expression of surface viral glycoproteins independently of T-cell trans-infection. , 2001, Cellular immunology.

[21]  A. Ridley,et al.  Rho family proteins: coordinating cell responses. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[22]  C. Cabañas,et al.  Rho and Rho-associated Kinase Modulate the Tyrosine Kinase PYK2 in T-cells through Regulation of the Activity of the Integrin LFA-1* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  R. Germain,et al.  Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. , 2001, Immunity.

[24]  U. Bommhardt,et al.  Disruption of Akt kinase activation is important for immunosuppression induced by measles virus , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[25]  V. ter meulen,et al.  CD150 (SLAM) Is a Receptor for Measles Virus but Is Not Involved in Viral Contact-Mediated Proliferation Inhibition , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[26]  L. Samelson,et al.  Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. , 2001, Immunity.

[27]  S. Wesselborg,et al.  The serine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A associate with and activate the actin‐binding protein cofilin in human T lymphocytes , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[28]  V. Meulen,et al.  Measles virus‐induced promotion of dendritic cell maturation by soluble mediators does not overcome the immunosuppressive activity of viral glycoproteins on the cell surface , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[29]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Measles Virus-Induced Immunosuppression In Vitro Is Independent of Complex Glycosylation of Viral Glycoproteins and of Hemifusion , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[30]  A. Fischer,et al.  Consequences of Fas-Mediated Human Dendritic Cell Apoptosis Induced by Measles Virus , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[31]  K. H. Lee,et al.  Cofilin: a missing link between T cell co‐stimulation and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[32]  X. Bustelo Regulatory and Signaling Properties of the Vav Family , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Proteolytic Cleavage of the Fusion Protein but Not Membrane Fusion Is Required for Measles Virus-Induced Immunosuppression In Vitro , 2000, Journal of Virology.

[34]  P. Vidalain,et al.  Measles Virus Induces Abnormal Differentiation of CD40 Ligand-Activated Human Dendritic Cells1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  F. Sánchez‐Madrid,et al.  Rho GTPases control migration and polarization of adhesion molecules and cytoskeletal ERM components in T lymphocytes , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[36]  S. Reed,et al.  Cell Cycle Arrest during Measles Virus Infection: a G0-Like Block Leads to Suppression of Retinoblastoma Protein Expression , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[37]  R. Fujinami,et al.  Modulation of Immune System Function by Measles Virus Infection: Role of Soluble Factor and Direct Infection , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[38]  K. Tedford,et al.  Vav links antigen-receptor signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. , 1998, Seminars in immunology.

[39]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Cell cycle arrest rather than apoptosis is associated with measles virus contact-mediated immunosuppression in vitro. , 1997, The Journal of general virology.

[40]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Measles virus-induced immune suppression in the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) model depends on viral glycoproteins , 1997, Journal of virology.

[41]  B. Cocks,et al.  SLAM and its role in T cell activation and Th cell responses , 1997, Immunology and cell biology.

[42]  M. Billeter,et al.  Interaction of measles virus glycoproteins with the surface of uninfected peripheral blood lymphocytes induces immunosuppression in vitro. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  L. Dunster,et al.  Physical association of moesin and CD46 as a receptor complex for measles virus , 1995, Journal of virology.

[44]  N. Sato,et al.  Perturbation of cell adhesion and microvilli formation by antisense oligonucleotides to ERM family members , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  S. Wesselborg,et al.  Costimulatory signals for human T-cell activation induce nuclear translocation of pp19/cofilin. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  C. Richardson,et al.  Oligopeptides that specifically inhibit membrane fusion by paramyxoviruses: studies on the site of action. , 1983, Virology.

[47]  J. Bamburg,et al.  A phosphatase for cofilin to be HAD , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[48]  V. ter meulen,et al.  Dendritic cells and measles virus infection. , 2003, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[49]  P. Borrow,et al.  Measles virus-mononuclear cell interactions. , 1995, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[50]  L. Dunster,et al.  Moesin: a cell membrane protein linked with susceptibility to measles virus infection. , 1994, Virology.