Comparison of Routine Prophylaxis With Vancomycin or Cefazolin for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery: Microbiological and Clinical Outcomes

Objective. To assess the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus aureus and the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after vancomycin or cefazolin prophylaxis for femoral neck fracture surgery. Design. Prospective cohort study. Setting. A hospital with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) carriage. Patients. All patients admitted with a femoral neck fracture from March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005 were prospectively identified and screened for MRSA and vancomycin-resistant (VRE) carriage at admission and at day 7. Deep incisional and organ/space SSIs were also recorded. Results. Of 263 patients included in the study, 152 (58%) received cefazolin and 106 (40%) received vancomycin. At admission, the prevalence of MRSA carriage was 6.8%; it was 12% among patients with risk factors and 2.2% among patients with no risk factors (P = .002). At day 7 after surgery, there were 6 patients (2%) who had hospital-acquired MRSA, corresponding to 0.7% in the cefazolin group and 5% in the vancomycin group (P = .04); none of the MRSA isolates were resistant to glycopeptides. The rate of VRE carriage at admission was 0.4%. Three patients (1%) had acquired carriage of VRE (1 had E. faecium and 2 had E. faecalis); all 3 were in the cefazolin group (2% of patients) and none in the vancomycin group (P = .27). Eight SSIs (3%) occurred, 4% in the cefazolin group and 2% in the vancomycin group (P = .47). Conclusions. This preliminary study demonstrates that cefazolin and vancomycin prophylaxis have similar impacts on the emergence of glycopeptide-resistant pathogens. Neither MRSA infection nor increased rates of SSI with other bacteria were observed in the vancomycin group, suggesting that a larger multicenter study should be initiated.

[1]  R. Coello,et al.  Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  A. Huletsky,et al.  Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in less than 1 hour during a hospital surveillance program. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  D. Bratzler,et al.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  D. Fry,et al.  Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[5]  J. Lucet,et al.  High Prevalence of Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hospital Admission in Elderly Patients: Implications for Infection Control Strategies , 2005, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  P. Courvalin,et al.  Detection of the van Alphabet and Identification of Enterococci and Staphylococci at the Species Level by Multiplex PCR , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  G. Bou,et al.  Lack of correlation between phenotypic techniques and PCR-based genotypic methods for identification of Enterococcus spp. , 2004, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[8]  R. Rapp,et al.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: an important consideration for orthopedic surgeons. , 2004, Orthopedics.

[9]  V. Fowler,et al.  Risk factors for postoperative mediastinitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  J. Merrer,et al.  Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage Among Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures Implication for Antibiotic Prophylaxis , 2004, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  Y. Carmeli,et al.  Glycopeptides are no more effective than beta-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[12]  R. Platt,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery: does the past predict the future? , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  G. Hedin,et al.  Rapid Screening and Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Clinical Samples by Selective-Broth and Real-Time PCR Assay , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  S. Cosgrove,et al.  Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[15]  C. Soussy,et al.  Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie report 2003. , 2003, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[16]  S. Milo,et al.  Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  R. Platt,et al.  Clinical consequences and cost of limiting use of vancomycin for perioperative prophylaxis: example of coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[18]  M. Ploy,et al.  Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Fecal Samples from Hospitalized Patients and Nonhospitalized Controls in a Cattle-Rearing Area of France , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[19]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[20]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[21]  B. Robinson-Dunn,et al.  Emergence of Vancomycin Resistance inStaphylococcus aureus , 1999 .

[22]  B. Robinson-Dunn,et al.  Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Working Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Perrier-Gros-Claude,et al.  [Vancomycin resistant enterococcus in France. High prevalence in a young ambulatory care patient population]. , 1998, Presse medicale.

[24]  K. Hiramatsu The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Japan. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  R. Anthony,et al.  Analysis of an outbreak of non-phage-typeable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by using a randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assay , 1997, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[26]  Nicole,et al.  Fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients and those living in the community in The Netherlands , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[27]  Y. Buisson,et al.  [Asymptomatic carriers of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in France. Study in an ambulatory population of young subjects]. , 1997, Presse medicale.

[28]  V. Fraser,et al.  The epidemiology of chest and leg wound infections following cardiothoracic surgery. , 1996, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[29]  R. Hakenbeck,et al.  Enterococcus faecium strains with vanA-mediated high-level glycopeptide resistance isolated from animal foodstuffs and fecal samples of humans in the community. , 1995, Microbial drug resistance.

[30]  M. Gilchrist Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance , 1995, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[31]  J. Bates,et al.  Faecal carriage and nosocomial spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. , 1994, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[32]  F. Goldstein,et al.  Communiqué 1992 du comité de l'antibiogramme de la société française de microbiologie , 1990 .