Multi-Level Integration of Environmentally Perturbed Internal Phenotypes Reveals Key Points of Connectivity between Them

The genotype and external phenotype of organisms are linked by so-called internal phenotypes which are influenced by environmental conditions. In this study, we used five existing -omics datasets representing five different layers of internal phenotypes, which were simultaneously measured in dietarily perturbed mice. We performed 10 pair-wise correlation analyses verified with a null model built from randomized data. Subsequently, the inferred networks were merged and literature mined for co-occurrences of identified linked nodes. Densely connected internal phenotypes emerged. Forty-five nodes have links with all other data-types and we denote them “connectivity hubs.” In literature, we found proof of 6% of the 577 connections, suggesting a biological meaning for the observed correlations. The observed connectivities between metabolite and cytokines hubs showed higher numbers of literature hits as compared to the number of literature hits on the connectivities between the microbiota and gene expression internal phenotypes. We conclude that multi-level integrated networks may help to generate hypotheses and to design experiments aiming to further close the gap between genotype and phenotype. We describe and/or hypothesize on the biological relevance of four identified multi-level connectivity hubs.

[1]  G. Hooiveld,et al.  Maternal exposure to a Western‐style diet causes differences in intestinal microbiota composition and gene expression of suckling mouse pups , 2016, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[2]  Cristiana G O Dal'molin,et al.  Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals , 2016, Microbiome.

[3]  Narciso Couto,et al.  The role of glutathione reductase and related enzymes on cellular redox homoeostasis network. , 2016, Free radical biology & medicine.

[4]  G. Smyth,et al.  ROBUST HYPERPARAMETER ESTIMATION PROTECTS AGAINST HYPERVARIABLE GENES AND IMPROVES POWER TO DETECT DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION. , 2016, The annals of applied statistics.

[5]  G. Gloor,et al.  Human milk microbiota profiles in relation to birthing method, gestation and infant gender , 2016, Microbiome.

[6]  G. Vinderola,et al.  Production of conjugated dienoic and trienoic fatty acids by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria , 2015 .

[7]  C. Foyer,et al.  Glutathione--linking cell proliferation to oxidative stress. , 2015, Free radical biology & medicine.

[8]  P. Shannon,et al.  CyREST: Turbocharging Cytoscape Access for External Tools via a RESTful API , 2015, F1000Research.

[9]  V. M. D. Martins dos Santos,et al.  Network analysis of temporal functionalities of the gut induced by perturbations in new-born piglets , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[10]  I. Cicha,et al.  TNF-α in the cardiovascular system: from physiology to therapy , 2015 .

[11]  L. Tenori,et al.  Probabilistic networks of blood metabolites in healthy subjects as indicators of latent cardiovascular risk. , 2015, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  B. Hallström,et al.  The Kidney Transcriptome and Proteome Defined by Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Profiling , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier , 2014, EMBO reports.

[14]  A. Hunter,et al.  Intermediate phenotypes and biomarkers of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder , 2014, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[15]  J. Selbig,et al.  Understanding the Relationship between Cotton Fiber Properties and Non-Cellulosic Cell Wall Polysaccharides , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  N. Pace,et al.  Specific Microbiome Changes in a Mouse Model of Parenteral Nutrition Associated Liver Injury and Intestinal Inflammation , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  D. Antonopoulos,et al.  Exercise Prevents Weight Gain and Alters the Gut Microbiota in a Mouse Model of High Fat Diet-Induced Obesity , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  Christopher P. Thomas,et al.  The importance of the lipoxygenase-hepoxilin pathway in the mammalian epidermal barrier. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  Timothy L. Tickle,et al.  Gut microbiome composition and function in experimental colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[20]  Steven R. Tannenbaum,et al.  Arsenic Exposure Perturbs the Gut Microbiome and Its Metabolic Profile in Mice: An Integrated Metagenomics and Metabolomics Analysis , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  A. Lusis,et al.  Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  G. Pacheco-López,et al.  The microbiota-gut-brain axis: neurobehavioral correlates, health and sociality , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[23]  Ignacio González,et al.  Visualising associations between paired ‘omics’ data sets , 2012, BioData Mining.

[24]  Diogo M. Camacho,et al.  Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference , 2012, Nature Methods.

[25]  Robert S Chapkin,et al.  A metagenomic study of diet-dependent interaction between gut microbiota and host in infants reveals differences in immune response , 2012, Genome Biology.

[26]  H. Daniel,et al.  Dose-Dependent Effects of Dietary Fat on Development of Obesity in Relation to Intestinal Differential Gene Expression in C57BL/6J Mice , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  S. Omholt,et al.  Phenomics: the next challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  Arnold M Saxton,et al.  Comparison of threshold selection methods for microarray gene co-expression matrices , 2009, BMC Research Notes.

[29]  Ignacio González,et al.  integrOmics: an R package to unravel relationships between two omics datasets , 2009, Bioinform..

[30]  Erick Antezana,et al.  Biological knowledge management: the emerging role of the Semantic Web technologies , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[31]  R. Bibiloni,et al.  Changes in Gut Microbiota Control Metabolic Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation in High-Fat Diet–Induced Obesity and Diabetes in Mice , 2008, Diabetes.

[32]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. , 2007, Genes & development.

[33]  P. Mendes,et al.  The origin of correlations in metabolomics data , 2005, Metabolomics.

[34]  Z. Oltvai,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[36]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[37]  R. Smialowicz,et al.  Development of the murine and human immune system: differential effects of immunotoxicants depend on time of exposure. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[38]  P. Bruni,et al.  Glutathione transport system in human small intestine epithelial cells. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[39]  L. Fontanesi Metabolomics and livestock genomics: Insights into a phenotyping frontier and its applications in animal breeding , 2016 .

[40]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics , 2011 .

[41]  Johan Lindberg,et al.  Correlation Network Analysis for Data Integration and Biomarker Selectionw , 2007 .

[42]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[43]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data , 2005 .

[44]  M. Miller,et al.  Environmental effects on pig performance, meat quality, and muscle characteristics. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[45]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[46]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .