Strategic serendipity: How one organization planned for and took advantage of unexpected communicative opportunities

This paper contributes to critical voices on the issue of strategic communication. It does so by exploring how an organisation can seize the moment of serendipity based on careful preparation of its issues management and communication channels. The focus of the study is the media coverage of – and communicative responses to – Kopenhagen Fur's campaign The World's Best – but not perfect in both broadcast media (e.g. print and television) and social media, more specifically Facebook. Through understanding how an organisation can plan for and take advantage of the unpredictable through state-of-the-art knowledge and in-depth understanding of the affordances of different communication channels, we discuss the importance of establishing opportunities for serendipity in strategic communication planning. The contribution of the paper is to develop the concept of strategic serendipity and show how organisations as communicative actors can take advantage of the serendipity afforded by other actors' campaigns when advocating and campaigning.

[1]  Jay J. Janney,et al.  Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal , 2011 .

[2]  Marita Vos,et al.  Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: acknowledging multiple issue arenas , 2010 .

[3]  Sam H. Dekay.  How large companies react to negative Facebook comments , 2012 .

[4]  Carl H. Botan.  Ethics in Strategic Communication Campaigns: The Case for a New Approach to Public Relations , 1997 .

[5]  Natasha Guinan,et al.  Serendipity , 2001 .

[6]  Royston M. Roberts,et al.  Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science , 1989 .

[7]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Dystechnia: a model of technology deficiency and implications for entrepreneurial opportunity , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

[8]  K. Jensen.  Media Convergence: The Three Degrees of Network, Mass and Interpersonal Communication , 2010 .

[9]  W. Bion.  Attention and Interpretation , 1970 .

[10]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Obsessed maniacs and clairvoyant oracles: empirically validated patterns of entrepreneurial behavior , 2013 .

[11]  W. Davis.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 2012 .

[12]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[13]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[14]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[15]  Steve McDonald,et al.  Right place, right time: serendipity and informal job matching , 2010 .

[16]  Kirk Hallahan,et al.  Defining Strategic Communication , 2007 .

[17]  C. Hine,et al.  Virtual Methods : Issues in Social Research on the Internet , 2007 .

[18]  Stine Lomborg,et al.  Researching Communicative Practice: Web Archiving in Qualitative Social Media Research , 2012 .

[19]  D. Boyd.  Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications , 2010 .

[20]  R. Stavins,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[21]  Shani Orgad,et al.  How can researchers make sense of the issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data , 2009 .

[22]  H. Chaiklin,et al.  The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity , 2005 .

[23]  C. Harvey,et al.  Leadership and negative capability , 2002 .

[24]  P. Walter.  Walking Along the Serendipitous Path of Discovery , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[26]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture , 2013 .

[27]  Christian Fieseler,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the Blogosphere , 2010 .

[28]  C. Hardy,et al.  Discourse as a Strategic Resource , 2000 .

[29]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis , 2000 .

[30]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Obsessed maniacs and clairvoyant oracles: empirically validated patterns of entrepreneurial behavior , 2013, 2013 Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET).

[31]  R. Yin.  Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research , 1994 .

[32]  R Pulling,et al.  The right place. , 1992, The Canadian nurse.

[33]  Shani Orgad,et al.  From online to offline and back: moving from online to offline relationships with research informants , 2005 .

[34]  Annette N. Markham.  Undermining 'data': A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry , 2013, First Monday.

[35]  Danah Boyd,et al.  None of this is real: identity and participation in Friendster , 2008 .

[36]  L. Christensen.  Marketing as auto‐communication , 1997 .

[37]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Critical Management Studies , 1993 .

[38]  J. Burchell,et al.  Assessing the impact of stakeholder dialogue: changing relationships between NGOs and companies , 2006 .

[39]  Jo-Ida C. Hansen,et al.  The Categorization of Serendipitous Career Development Events , 1996 .

[40]  John M. T. Balmer,et al.  Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products , 2007 .

[41]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[42]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Organizations as Discursive Constructions , 2004 .

[43]  F. Darbellay,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research Boosted by Serendipity , 2014 .

[44]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..