Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in Information Systems

The holistic and insightful nature of the (cultural-historical) Activity Theory has led to its use by several researchers as a suitable vehicle for understanding and analysis in many areas of IS research and practice. This paper demonstrates the application of Activity Theory to the study of socio-technical systems which mediate complex, collective activities in the modern workplace and in everyday life. Vignettes from five ongoing research projects are reported in order to illustrate not only the explanatory power of the Activity Theory research framework but also its use in determining appropriate methods used to manage the data collection and analysis processes as well as its interpretation., The paper demonstrates the variety of IS topics where an Activity Theory based approach is able to add richness and insight.

[1]  Leoni Warne,et al.  Making the Invisible Visible: modelling social learning in a knowledge management context , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  S. L. Star,et al.  Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems , 1996 .

[3]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Action research in organisations , 2000 .

[4]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Knowledge Creation through Systems Development , 2004 .

[5]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  A pilgrim's progress: From cognitive science to cooperative design , 1990, AI & SOCIETY.

[6]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[7]  V. Kaptelinin.  Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[8]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[9]  Marx W. Wartofsky,et al.  Perception, Representation, and the Forms of Action: Towards an Historical Epistemology , 1979 .

[10]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Organisational memory and learning network organisation: the case of Finnish labour protection inspectors , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[13]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[14]  Helen Hasan,et al.  A Multifaceted Approach to Distributed Communities of Learning and Practice , 2003 .

[15]  Amin Rajan,et al.  In the age of the smart machine , 1990 .

[16]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Li Cheng,et al.  A contextual approach to design and development of interfaces for search engines, using Activity Theory as the basis for informing design decisions , 2005 .

[18]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[19]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Articulating knowledge work: the contributions of Activity Theory and task-based knowledge management , 2005 .

[20]  Stephen W. Draper.  Book Review: Activity Theory: The New Direction for HCI? "Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface," edited by J. M. Carroll , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Activity Analysis as a Method for Information Systems Development: General Introduction and Experiments from Nigeria and Finland , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Helen Hasan.  Integrating IS and HCI Using Activity Theory as a Philosophical and Theoretical Basis , 1999, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..