Conceptual Design of Compliant Parallel Mechanisms

This chapter presents the conceptual design of compliant mechanisms. The fundamental idea behind it is to establish the relationship between freedom and constraint space of a compliant mechanism according to the reciprocal relationship between twists and wrenches. By using the constraint-based design approach, a flexible element can be represented by the constraint wrench exerted from it. Thus by knowing the preferred mobility of a compliant mechanism, the configuration of constraints can be determined according to the reciprocal relationship, which further leads to the layout design of the compliant mechanism. Without the loss of generality, compliant parallel mechanisms with single degree-of-freedom flexible elements are selected to verify the proposed design approach. Particularly a physical prototype implemented with shape-memory-alloy (SMA) actuators is built and tested. By employing SMA springs, the single DOF flexible element that resists the translation along its axis can be transformed into a linear actuator that generates a stroke along its axis. Both finite-element-simulations and experimental tests were carried out to verify the mobility of the compliant parallel mechanism, thus validating the initial conceptual design approach.

[1]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Design of flexure-based motion stages for mechatronic systems via Freedom, Actuation and Constraint Topologies (FACT) , 2010 .

[2]  Harvey Lipkin,et al.  A Classification of Robot Compliance , 1993 .

[3]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms , 2000 .

[4]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  A screw theory basis for quantitative and graphical design tools that define layout of actuators to minimize parasitic errors in parallel flexure systems , 2010 .

[5]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  A six-component contact force measurement device based on the Stewart platform , 2000 .

[6]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  The Elliptic Polarity of Screws , 1985 .

[7]  Shorya Awtar,et al.  Constraint-based design of parallel kinematic XY flexure mechanisms , 2007 .

[8]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Samuel Hunt Drake,et al.  Using compliance in lieu of sensory feedback for automatic assembly. , 1978 .

[10]  Jingjun Yu,et al.  An Analytical Approach for Synthesizing Line Actuation Spaces of Parallel Flexure Mechanisms. , 2013, Journal of mechanical design.

[11]  S O R Moheimani,et al.  Invited review article: high-speed flexure-guided nanopositioning: mechanical design and control issues. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Engineering design framework for a shape memory alloy coil spring actuator using a static two-state model , 2012 .

[13]  D. Gweon,et al.  Development of a novel 3-degrees of freedom flexure based positioning system. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[14]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  An earthworm-like micro robot using shape memory alloy actuator , 2006 .

[15]  C. Barus A treatise on the theory of screws , 1998 .

[16]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  Synthesis of Actuation Spaces of Multi-Axis Parallel Flexure Mechanisms Based on Screw Theory , 2011 .

[17]  Jan Van Humbeeck,et al.  Non-medical applications of shape memory alloys , 1999 .

[18]  Larry L. Howell,et al.  An XYZ Micromanipulator with three translational degrees of freedom , 2006, Robotica.

[19]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Novel Force Sensing Approach Employing Prismatic-Tip Optical Fiber Inside an Orthoplanar Spring Structure , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[20]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  Realizing Orthogonal Motions With Wire Flexures Connected in Parallel , 2010 .

[21]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Interrelationship between screw systems and corresponding reciprocal systems and applications , 2001 .

[22]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Synthesis of multi-degree of freedom, parallel flexure system concepts via freedom and constraint topology (FACT). Part II: Practice , 2010 .

[23]  F. Dimentberg The screw calculus and its applications in mechanics , 1968 .

[24]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The eigenscrew decomposition of spatial stiffness matrices , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  A Novel Piezoactuated XY Stage With Parallel, Decoupled, and Stacked Flexure Structure for Micro-/Nanopositioning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[26]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[27]  D. Gweon,et al.  Development of flexure based 6-degrees of freedom parallel nano-positioning system with large displacement. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[28]  Layton Carter Hale,et al.  Principles and Techniques for Designing Precision Machines , 2013 .

[29]  Neil Morgan,et al.  Medical shape memory alloy applications—the market and its products , 2004 .

[30]  J. H. Kyung,et al.  Design of a microgripper for micromanipulation of microcomponents using SMA wires and flexible hinges , 2008 .

[31]  Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al.  Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys , 2007 .