Optimization of correlated multiple responses of ultrasonic machining (USM) process

Ultrasonic machining (USM) process has several important performance measures (responses), some of which are correlated. For example, material removal rate and tool wear rate are highly correlated. Although in the recent past several methods have been proposed in the literature to resolve the multi-response optimization problems, only a few of them take care of the possible correlation between the responses. All these methods primarily make use of principal component analysis (PCA) to consider the possible correlation between the responses. Process engineers may face the difficulty of selecting the appropriate method because the relative optimization performances of these methods are unknown. In this paper, two sets of past experimental data on USM process are analysed using three methods dealing with the multiple correlated responses, and the optimization performances of these three methods are subsequently compared. It is observed that both the weighted principal component (WPC) and PCA-based TOPSIS methods result in a better optimization performance than the PCA-based grey relational analysis method. However, the WPC method is preferable because of its simpler computational procedure.

[1]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization , 1996 .

[2]  Chi-Bin Cheng,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy and genetic algorithm in multiple response optimization , 2002 .

[3]  D. Aspinwall,et al.  Review on ultrasonic machining , 1998 .

[4]  C. Wang,et al.  Optimizing multiple quality characteristics via Taguchi method-based Grey analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Saeed Maghsoodloo,et al.  Strengths and limitations of taguchi's contributions to quality, manufacturing, and process engineering , 2004 .

[6]  Hm Hsu,et al.  A genetic algorithm for the optimal design of microwave filters , 1999 .

[7]  Li Tong,et al.  Multi-response optimization using principal component analysis and grey relational analysis , 2002 .

[8]  A. Khuri,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions , 1981 .

[9]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem , 1993 .

[10]  Carolyn R. Boyle,et al.  An interactive multiple-response simulation optimization method , 1996 .

[11]  Hung-Chang Liao,et al.  Multi-response optimization using weighted principal component , 2006 .

[12]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Taguchi technique for modeling material removal rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium , 2007 .

[13]  Chao-Ton Su,et al.  Optimization of TQFP molding process using neuro-fuzzy-GA approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Kwang-Jae Kim,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions , 2000 .

[15]  Akshay Dvivedi,et al.  Surface quality evaluation in ultrasonic drilling through the Taguchi technique , 2007 .

[16]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[17]  H. Dam,et al.  Productivity, surface quality and tolerances in ultrasonic machining of ceramics , 1995 .

[18]  Hung-Cheng Chen,et al.  Optimization of multiple responses using principal component analysis and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution , 2005 .

[19]  Lee-Ing Tong,et al.  Optimization of multi-response processes using the VIKOR method , 2007 .

[20]  Muh-Cherng Wu,et al.  An enhanced Taguchi method for optimizing SMT processes , 1992 .

[21]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  Investigating and modeling tool-wear rate in the ultrasonic machining of titanium , 2009 .

[22]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  Modeling the material removal rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium using dimensional analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Joseph J. Pignatiello,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR ROBUST MULTIRESPONSE QUALITY ENGINEERING , 1993 .

[24]  Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki,et al.  Multi-response simulation optimization using genetic algorithm within desirability function framework , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[25]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[26]  Chao-Ton Su,et al.  Applying neural network approach to achieve robust design for dynamic quality characteristics , 1998 .

[27]  Lee-Ing Tong,et al.  Optimization of multiple quality responses involving qualitative and quantitative characteristics in IC manufacturing using neural networks , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[28]  R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Multi response optimization of wire EDM operations using robust design of experiments , 2006 .

[29]  A. Moisan,et al.  Ultrasonic Machining: an Analytical and Experimental Study on Contour Machining Based on Neural Network , 1999 .

[30]  J. S. Khamba,et al.  Ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys : A review , 2006 .

[31]  Kwok-Leung Tsui Robust design optimization for multiple characteristic problems , 1999 .

[32]  Z. J. Pei,et al.  Rotary Ultrasonic Machining of stainless steels: empirical study of machining variables , 2010, Int. J. Manuf. Res..

[33]  Jatinder Kumar,et al.  An investigation into the machining characteristics of titanium using ultrasonic machining , 2008 .