Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate image search and retrieval problems in selected search engines in relation to Persian writing style challenges.
Design/methodology/approach
This study is an applied one, and to answer the questions the authors used an evaluative research method. The aim of the research is to explore the morphological and semantic problems of Persian language in connection with image search and retrieval among the three major and widespread search engines: Google, Yahoo and Bing. In order to collect the data, a checklist designed by the researcher was used and then the data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings
The results indicate that Google, Yahoo and Bing search engines do not pay enough attention to morphological and semantic features of Persian language in image search and retrieval. This research reveals that six groups of Persian language features include derived words, derived/compound words, Persian and Arabic Plural words, use of dotted T and the use of spoken language and polysemy, which are the major problems in this area. In addition, the results suggest that Google is the best search engine of all in terms of compatibility with Persian language features.
Originality/value
This study investigated some new aspects of the above-mentioned subject through combining morphological and semantic aspects of Persian language with image search and retrieval. Therefore, this study is an interdisciplinary research, the results of which would help both to offer some solutions and to carry out similar research on this subject area. This study will also fill a gap in research studies conducted so far in this area in Farsi language, especially in image search and retrieval. Moreover, findings of this study can help to bridge the gap between the user’s questions and search engines (systems) retrievals. In addition, the methodology of this paper provides a framework for further research on image search and retrieval in databases and search engines.
[1]
Dirk Lewandowski,et al.
Problems with the use of web search engines to find results in foreign languages
,
2008,
Online Inf. Rev..
[2]
Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.
How do search engines respond to some non-English queries?
,
2005,
J. Inf. Sci..
[3]
Mohammad Dabir-Moghaddam,et al.
Academy of Persian Language and Literature
,
2018,
Oxford Handbooks Online.
[4]
Chunju Tseng,et al.
SpidersRUs: Creating specialized search engines in multiple languages
,
2008,
Decis. Support Syst..
[5]
Jin Zhang,et al.
Multiple language supports in search engines
,
2007,
Online Inf. Rev..
[6]
Fotis Lazarinis.
Evaluating the searching capabilities of e-commerce web sites in a non-English language: A Greek case study
,
2007,
Online Inf. Rev..
[7]
Alireza Isfandyari Moghaddam.
Web metasearch engines: A comparative study on search capabilities using an evaluation check‐list
,
2007
.
[8]
Fotis Lazarinis.
Improving concept-based web image retrieval by mixing semantically similar Greek queries
,
2008,
Program.
[9]
Fotis Lazarinis,et al.
Web retrieval systems and the Greek language: do they have an understanding?
,
2007,
J. Inf. Sci..
[10]
Ying Liu,et al.
A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics
,
2007,
Pattern Recognit..
[11]
Bassam H. Hammo.
Towards enhancing retrieval effectiveness of search engines for diacritisized Arabic documents
,
2008,
Information Retrieval.
[12]
Kehua Guo,et al.
Combined retrieval: A convenient and precise approach for Internet image retrieval
,
2016,
Inf. Sci..