10 Years Later: Lessons Learned from an Academic Multidisciplinary Cosmetic Center

Background: In 2006, a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-accredited multidisciplinary academic ambulatory surgery center was established with the goal of delivering high-quality, efficient reconstructive, and cosmetic services in an academic setting. We review our decade-long experience since its establishment. Methods: Clinical and financial data from 2006 to 2016 are reviewed. All cosmetic procedures, including both minimally invasive and operative cases, are included. Data are compared to nationally published reports. Results: Nearly 3,500 cosmetic surgeries and 10,000 minimally invasive procedures were performed. Compared with national averages, surgical volume in abdominoplasty is high, whereas rhinoplasty and breast augmentation is low. Regarding trend data, breast augmentation volume has decreased by 25%, whereas minimally invasive procedural volume continues to grow and is comparable with national reports. Similarly, where surgical revenue remains steady, minimally invasive revenue has increased significantly. The majority of surgical cases (70%) are reconstructive in nature and insurance-based. Payer mix is 71% private insurance, 18% Medicare and Medicaid, and 11% self-pay. Despite year-over-year revenue increases, net profit in 2015 was $6,120. Rent and anesthesia costs exceed national averages, and employee salary and wages are the highest expenditure. Conclusion: Although the creation of our academic cosmetic ambulatory surgery center has greatly increased the overall volume of cosmetic surgery performed at the University of Wisconsin, the majority of surgical volume and revenue is reconstructive. As is seen nationwide, minimally invasive cosmetic procedures represent our most rapidly expanding revenue stream.

[1]  V. Rao,et al.  The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[2]  Scott R. Chaiet,et al.  Perioperative Arnica montana for Reduction of Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty Surgery , 2016, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  John J. Coleman,et al.  Academic Plastic Surgery: Faculty Recruitment and Retention , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  G. Dumanian,et al.  Predictors of Readmission after Outpatient Plastic Surgery , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. Bradley,et al.  Recent Trends in Resident Career Choices After Plastic Surgery Training , 2013, Annals of plastic surgery.

[6]  V. Rao,et al.  Establishing a Multidisciplinary Academic Cosmetic Center , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. , 2010, Health services research.

[8]  V. Rao,et al.  The Effect of Electroacustimulation on Postoperative Nausea, Vomiting, and Pain in Outpatient Plastic Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded, Clinical Trial , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Mary Bohnenblust,et al.  Breast Reduction Trend among Plastic Surgeons: A National Survey , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  W. Kuzon,et al.  Facility Cost Analysis in Outpatient Plastic Surgery: Implications for the Academic Health Center , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.