The Effect of Team Choice in Ingress and Pokémon GO for Players' Social Circles and Attitudes Towards Game Slang

Player communities in the location-based games Pokémon GO and Ingress differ from most online multiplayer game communities in two major ways: (1) Interaction between players occurs mostly face-to-face and (2) teams are static, for example, currently in Pokémon GO, changing teams is possible only once a year. In addition, much of the interaction between teams is non-verbal and occurs in the game world. The current study investigates how these characteristics affect the forming of player communities and friendships, and how the team of Pokémon Go and Ingress players can be used to predict the usage and attitudes towards a slang-word “jym” i.e. gym. Five Pokémon GO chats (242852 messages) from South-Western Finland were analyzed. In addition, a questionnaire (N=178) was sent to players in the case community, asking about their opinions and attitudes towards the word “jym”. The results highlight the importance of the team in location-based games for the forming of friendships and raise an issue that the lack of verbal communication and cooperative opportunities can lead to negative attitudes and prejudice towards players on the opposing team. The study shows the influence of exclusive team chats on players’ attitudes and draws parallels to the polarization of opinions due to personalized search results and social media. Game mechanics which encourage players from different teams to cooperate with one another are proposed as a solution for the

[1]  Daniel John Zizzo,et al.  Groups, cooperation and conflict in games , 2008 .

[2]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  STFU NOOB!: predicting crowdsourced decisions on toxic behavior in online games , 2014, WWW.

[3]  Akihiko Shirai,et al.  Gamification and construction of virtual field museum by using augmented reality game "Ingress" , 2015, VRIC.

[4]  Lee Yik Sheng,et al.  Modelling learning from Ingress (Google's augmented reality social game) , 2013, 2013 IEEE 63rd Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM).

[5]  The role of attention in the associative binding of emotionally arousing words , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Mateus David Finco I Play, You Play and We Play Together: Social Interaction Through the Use of Pokémon GO , 2019, Augmented Reality Games I.

[7]  Andrew J. Setterstrom,et al.  Social Influence and Willingness to Pay for Massively Multiplayer Online Games: An Empirical Examination of Social Identity Theory , 2019, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Judith Ackermann,et al.  Playing Computer Games as Social Interaction: An Analysis of LAN Parties , 2012 .

[9]  Michael Klesel,et al.  Perpetrators in League of Legends: Scale Development and Validation of Toxic Behavior , 2019, HICSS.

[10]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  J. Coleman The Life of Slang , 2012 .

[12]  David R. Ewoldsen,et al.  Ingroup Versus Outgroup Conflict in the Context of Violent Video Game Play , 2014, Commun. Res..

[13]  Burak Polat,et al.  Sociability on Location Based Mobile Games: An Ethnographic Research on Pokémon Go and Ingress in Istanbul , 2018 .

[14]  Susanna Paasovaara,et al.  Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players , 2017, MUM.

[15]  Christian McCrea We play in public: The nature and context of portable gaming systems , 2011 .

[16]  Lee Humphreys Involvement shield or social catalyst: Thoughts on sociospatial practice of Pokémon GO , 2017 .

[17]  Andrew Lepp,et al.  "Pokémon Go!" May Promote Walking, Discourage Sedentary Behavior in College Students. , 2017, Games for health journal.

[18]  Matthew Klugman,et al.  ‘Connected to Something’: Soccer and the Transnational Passions, Memories and Communities of Sydney's Italian Migrants , 2013 .

[19]  Ruth Potts,et al.  Pokémon Go-ing or staying: exploring the effect of age and gender on augmented reality game player experiences in public spaces , 2019, Journal of Urban Design.

[20]  C. Sunstein The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[21]  Stephen R. Burgess,et al.  Video Game Playing and Academic Performance in College Students. , 2012 .

[22]  R. Kircher,et al.  Attitudes towards Multicultural London English: implications for attitude theory and language planning , 2019, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.

[23]  Mansour Alsaleh,et al.  Behavioral consequences of Pokémon GO: The exaggerated picture , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge,et al.  Prime Example Ingress Reframing the Pervasive Game Design Framework (PGDF) , 2017, Int. J. Serious Games.

[25]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[26]  Maeve Serino,et al.  Pokémon Go and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians , 2016, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[27]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  A Sense of Belonging: Pokémon GO and Social Connectedness , 2019, Games Cult..

[28]  J. Bruner,et al.  Games, social exchange and the acquisition of language , 1978, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  M. Horwitz,et al.  Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Pokémon Go: Why do People Play Mobile Location-Based Augmented Reality Games? , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  D. Wann,et al.  Biased Evaluations of In-Group and Out-Group Spectator Behavior at Sporting Events: The Importance of Team Identification and Threats to Social Identity , 2005, The Journal of social psychology.

[32]  Samuli Laato,et al.  Analysis of the Quality of Points of Interest in the Most Popular Location-based Games , 2019, CompSysTech.

[33]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[34]  Anthony McEnery,et al.  Porting an English semantic tagger to the Finnish language , 2003 .

[35]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  Group Interactions in Location-Based Gaming: A Case Study of Raiding in Pokémon GO , 2019, CHI.

[36]  E. Papies Tempting food words activate eating simulations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Takahiro A. Kato,et al.  New game software (Pokémon Go) may help youth with severe social withdrawal, hikikomori , 2016, Psychiatry Research.

[38]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  A Review of Location-based Games: Do They All Support Exercise, Social Interaction and Cartographical Training? , 2019, CSEDU.

[39]  Bruce Gooch,et al.  Time will tell: in-game social interactions that facilitate second language acquisition , 2009, FDG.

[40]  Jędrzej Olejniczak A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF LANGUAGE VARIETY USED ONTWITCH.TV: DESRIPTIVE AND CORPUS-BASED APPROACHES , 2015 .

[41]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  The influence of individualism‐collectivism on perceptions of communication in ingroup and outgroup relationships , 1987 .

[42]  Suely Fragoso,et al.  Ludic Re-enchantment and the Power of Locative Games: A Case Study of the Game Ingress , 2016, CaTaC.

[43]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Blurring boundaries between everyday life and pervasive gaming: an interview study of ingress , 2016, MUM.

[44]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Social Interactions in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Gamers , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Exploring Cyberbullying and Other Toxic Behavior in Team Competition Online Games , 2015, CHI.

[46]  J. Mitchell Vaterlaus,et al.  “Reliving my Childhood Dream of being a Pokémon Trainer”: An Exploratory Study of College Student Uses and Gratifications Related to Pokémon Go , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Przemyslaw Guzik,et al.  The Pikachu effect: Social and health gaming motivations lead to greater benefits of Pokémon GO use , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  David G. Rand,et al.  In-Group Favoritism Caused by Pokémon Go and the Use of Machine Learning for Principled Investigation of Potential Moderators , 2017 .

[49]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Tomasz Oleksy,et al.  Catch them all and increase your place attachment! The role of location-based augmented reality games in changing people - place relations , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization , 2014 .

[52]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  There's no “I” in team: Effects of cooperative video games on cooperative behavior† , 2013 .

[53]  P. White The causal asymmetry. , 2006, Psychological review.

[54]  E. Uhlmann,et al.  Are members of low status groups perceived as bad, or badly off? Egalitarian negative associations and automatic prejudice , 2006 .

[55]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Geodata Classification for Automatic Content Creation in Location-Based Games , 2017, JCSG.

[56]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  C. Nigg,et al.  Pokémon GO May Increase Physical Activity and Decrease Sedentary Behaviors. , 2017, American journal of public health.

[58]  Sobah Abbas Petersen,et al.  #gottacatchemall: Exploring Pokemon Go in Search of Learning Enhancement Objects. , 2017 .

[59]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft , 2006, CSCW '06.