STUDY ON PV-PQ BUS TYPE SWITCHING LOGIC IN POWER FLOW COMPUTATION

A comprehensive investigation on bus PV-PQ type switching logic in power flow computation is carried out in this paper. Besides the power mismatches blow up, the frequent switching of some bus type is another kind of divergence to suffer. To remove this type of oscillation occurring on some buses in a power flow calculation, several complementary logics were used in references, but this kind of method may sometimes make the power flow converging to an unstable solution. Researches done by this paper show that failure in bus type identification may result in a kind of voltage instability corresponding to the limit induced bifurcation. Some numerical simulations on IEEE 118 bus test system and a practical power system have been carried out and the results support to explain this phenomenon. Based on a theoretical analysis, a set of inequality constraints describing stability conditions are defined as the necessary condition for a stable power flow solution. This paper gives an example to show that some wrong stability margins are obtained when an incorrect bus PV-PQ type switching logic is used in Continuation Power Flow computation for static voltage stability assessment.

[1]  William F. Tinney,et al.  Power Flow Solution by Newton's Method , 1967 .

[2]  O. Alsac,et al.  Fast Decoupled Load Flow , 1974 .

[3]  K. Okuda,et al.  Load Flow Convergence in the Vicinity of a Voltage Stability Limit , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[4]  Y. Tamura,et al.  A Load Flow Calculation Method for Ill-Conditioned Power Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Voltage collapse precipitated by the immediate change in stability when generator reactive power limits are encountered , 1992 .

[6]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[7]  Hsiao-Dong Chiang,et al.  CPFLOW: a practical tool for tracing power system steady-state stationary behavior due to load and generation variations , 1995 .

[8]  N. Maratos,et al.  Bifurcation points and loadability limits as solutions of constrained optimization problems , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[9]  Alexander J. Flueck,et al.  A new continuation power flow tool for investigating the nonlinear effects of transmission branch parameter variations , 2000 .

[10]  P. R. Bijwe,et al.  Nondivergent fast power flow methods , 2003 .

[11]  W. Rosehart,et al.  Optimal power flow with complementarity constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Yoshihiko Kataoka A smooth power flow model of electric power system with generator reactive power limits taken into consideration , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[13]  J.E. Tate,et al.  A comparison of the optimal multiplier in polar and rectangular coordinates , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  W. Rosehart,et al.  Complementarity model for generator buses in OPF-based maximum loading problems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Hua Li,et al.  A new continfency parameterization CPF model and sensivity method for voltage stability control , 2005, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005.