Digitalization and Leadership - How Experienced Leaders Interpret Daily Realities in a Digital World

Digitalization brings about great challenges for leaders of business organizations who now have to deal with disruptive changes on the commercial landscape, with data-driven decision making, as well as with new ways of crowd-based working; and with a workforce with ubiquitous access to information and establishing new ways of communication. In this paper, I examine leaders’ perspectives on these digitalization-driven developments. Employing a grounded theory approach, I analyzed data from qualitative interviews of 29 experienced business leaders and several observations. Leaders, as a unit of analysis, discuss environmental changes of leadership as well as updated practices of leaders’ communication with their followers. In addition, leaders self-report context-transcendence of their individual leadership styles. The insights contribute to a more integrative view of the interplay of digitalization and leadership and to the debate on whether the assumptions of leadership theories of the non-internet era are still valid.

[1]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .

[2]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  Kirstin C. Phelps.  “So Much Technology, So Little Talent”? Skills for Harnessing Technology for Leadership Outcomes , 2014 .

[5]  Selmin Nurcan,et al.  Digitization - Perspectives for Conceptualization , 2015, ESOCC Workshops.

[6]  Sarah J. Tracy.  Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research , 2010 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[8]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2014, MIS Q..

[9]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[10]  G. Hamilton,et al.  An Institutional Theory of Leadership , 1987 .

[11]  T. Mitchell,et al.  PATH-GOAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP , 1975 .

[12]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission , 2014, The Leadership Quarterly.

[13]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[14]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[15]  P. Dasgupta.  Literature Review: e-Leadership , 2011 .

[16]  P. Hersey,et al.  Life cycle theory of leadership. , 1979 .

[17]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[18]  Alan Bryman,et al.  The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership , 1996 .

[19]  N. Yee,et al.  The Digital Workforce and the Workplace of the Future , 2016 .

[20]  Pierre A. Balthazard,et al.  Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams , 2009 .

[21]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[22]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Leadership 2.0: Engaging and Supporting Leaders in the Transition towards a Networked Organization , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[24]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives , 2014 .

[25]  Meiyun Zuo,et al.  Examining the factors influencing cross-project knowledge transfer: An empirical study of IT services firms in China , 2015 .

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[27]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Enterprise Social Networks from a Manager's Perspective , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[28]  S. Kahai,et al.  E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice , 2000 .

[29]  B. Avolio,et al.  Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[30]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[31]  I. Zigurs.  Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[32]  Subhasish Dasgupta.  Encyclopedia of Virtual Communities and Technologies , 2006 .

[33]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[34]  R. Stogdill.  Personal factors associated with leadership; a survey of the literature. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[35]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[36]  R. Campbell,et al.  A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. , 1968 .

[37]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[39]  J. Mayfield,et al.  Leader Communication Strategies Critical Paths to Improving Employee Commitment , 2002 .

[40]  M. Haas,et al.  Which Problems to Solve? Online Knowledge Sharing and Attention Allocation in Organizations , 2014 .

[41]  S. Kahai,et al.  Adding the “E” to E-Leadership:: How it May Impact Your Leadership , 2003 .