Responses of the H1 Neuron of the Fly to Jumped Edges

Directional motion detection was measured as the response of the H1 neuron of the fly. The stimulus was the jump of a single black-white edge or a single bar through an angle of 1.5°, which is similar to the angle between adjacent receptor axes. An edge that advances by one receptor causes the same change in that receptor whichever way it moves, but the response is to one direction only. Therefore the steady state of the receptors before the stimulus jump is available to the directional motion perception mechanism no matter how long the stimulus has been at rest. This short-term memory of the previous state of the receptors persists even though the bar disappears briefly during its jump. Similarly, the response to a bar is directional although a black bar that jumps one way causes the same changes in a photoreceptor pair as a white bar that jumps the other way. Responses to ‘off9 are distinguished from directional responses to motion. If the contrast of the bar is reversed at the jump, the directionality is lost, showing that algebraic multiplication does not occur when the stimulus is a narrow bar. Motion is inferred by interaction of the nearest edge with the former position of an edge having the same orientation. Black-white edges therefore do not interact with white—black edges to produce a directional response. The results are discussed in terms of the template model, which is a Boolean representation of spatio-temporal fields of expectant neurons in parallel behind each visual axis.

[1]  K. Hausen Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[2]  Alexa Riehle,et al.  Directionally Selective Motion Detection by Insect Neurons , 1989 .

[3]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[4]  G A Horridge,et al.  A template theory to relate visual processing to digital circuitry , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  Klein,et al.  Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Peter J. Sobey,et al.  Implementation of the template model of vision , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  S. Anstis,et al.  Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast , 1975, Vision Research.

[8]  W. Reichardt Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[9]  T. Maddess,et al.  Afterimage-like effects in the motion-sensitive neuron H1 , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  A cross correlation process in the nervous center of an insect eye , 1959 .

[11]  J Kien,et al.  Sensory integration in the locust optomotor system--II: direction selective neurons in the circumoesophageal connectives and the optic lobe. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  W Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .