Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective

The paper presents a study aiming to assess how users belonging to different generations perceive service robots in the home context, in order to gain insights of multiple aspects of user needs and attitudes towards robots as to inform the design of robots that are universally acceptable. Surveys with 30 subjects from 10 Singaporean families were conducted. These subjects belonged to three generations, namely young adults, working adults, and elderly people. The survey had two phases; during the first phase, interviews were conducted in users’ homes to assess their general attitudes and preferences of service robots. The second phase involved an interaction process between the users and a prototype robot in a simulated smart home environment. Users’ feedback was collected according to multiple aspects of robot usability and acceptability. It was found that users of all ages were wishing for service robots to help handle home chores, and they expected the robot to complete the task with good reliability and efficiency. However, users of different age groups showed different patterns of concerns over robot usage. A multi-generational perspective is helpful to understand users’ needs and attitudes that reflect age differences. It also provides insights into how members of a family share attitudes towards robots.

[1]  Gerhard Rigoll,et al.  The Robot ALIAS as a Database for Health Monitoring for Elderly People , 2014 .

[2]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  An Initial Framework to Unpack Long-Term Acceptance of Robots at Home , 2010 .

[3]  Hussein A. Abdullah,et al.  Design Issues for Therapeutic Robot Systems: Results from a Survey of Physiotherapists , 2005, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[4]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  What makes people accept a robot in a social environment - discussion from six-week study in an office - , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  I'll keep an eye on you: Home robot companion for elderly people with cognitive impairment , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? , 2010, CSCW '10.

[10]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  An affective guide robot in a shopping mall , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Eva Berner,et al.  Semi-Autonomous Teleoperated Learning In-Home Service Robots for Elderly Care : A Qualitative Study on Needs and Perceptions of Elderly People, Family Caregivers, and Professional Caregivers , 2010 .

[14]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people , 2008 .

[15]  John Travis Butler,et al.  Psychological Effects of Behavior Patterns of a Mobile Personal Robot , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[18]  Renxi Qiu,et al.  User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home , 2012, HRI 2012.

[19]  Sandra Bedaf,et al.  What Should a Robot do for you? - Evaluating the Needs of the Elderly in the UK , 2013, ACHI 2013.

[20]  Martin Buss,et al.  Towards proactive human-robot interaction in human environments , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom).

[21]  Johan Aberg,et al.  What help do older people need?: constructing a functional design space of electronic assistive technology applications , 2005, Assets '05.

[22]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Design for Acceptability: Improving Robots’ Coexistence in Human Society , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[23]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  What Older People Expect of Robots: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2013, ICSR.

[24]  Gerhard Rigoll,et al.  The Robot ALIAS as a Gaming Platform for Elderly Persons , 2014 .

[25]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  Older People's Involvement in the Development of a Social Assistive Robot , 2013, ICSR.

[26]  Lorenzo Blasi,et al.  Service robots in elderly care at home: Users' needs and perceptions as a basis for concept development , 2012 .

[27]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[29]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor , 2010, CHI.

[30]  Martin Buss,et al.  Proactively Approaching Pedestrians with an Autonomous Mobile Robot in Urban Environments , 2012, ISER.

[31]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[32]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robotic etiquette: Results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[33]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[34]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[35]  Don G. Bouwhuis,et al.  Gerontechnology in perspective , 2007 .

[36]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[37]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[38]  Alexander Libin,et al.  Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists' point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[39]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[40]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home , 2006, HRI '06.

[41]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey , 2005 .

[42]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[43]  Mark H. Lee,et al.  Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly , 2006, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[44]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[45]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Robots to motivate elderly people: Present and future challenges , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[46]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.