Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

In everyday life, we seamlessly adapt our movements and consolidate them to multiple behavioral contexts. This natural flexibility seems to be contingent on the presence of movement-related sensorimotor cues and cannot be reproduced when static visual or haptic cues are given to signify different behavioral contexts. So far, only sensorimotor cues that dissociate the sensorimotor plans prior to force field exposure have been successful in learning two opposing perturbations. Here we show that vestibular cues, which are only available during the perturbation, improve the formation and recall of multiple control strategies. We exposed subjects to inertial forces by accelerating them laterally on a vestibular platform. The coupling between reaching movement (forward-backward) and acceleration direction (leftward-rightward) switched every 160 trials, resulting in two opposite force environments. When exposed for a second time to the same environment, with the opposite environment in between, subjects showed retention resulting in an ∼3 times faster adaptation rate compared with the first exposure. Our results suggest that vestibular cues provide contextual information throughout the reach, which is used to facilitate independent learning and recall of multiple motor memories. Vestibular cues provide feedback about the underlying cause of reach errors, thereby disambiguating the various task environments and reducing interference of motor memories.

[1]  J. Lackner,et al.  Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Ian S Howard,et al.  Composition and Decomposition in Bimanual Dynamic Learning , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  W Pieter Medendorp,et al.  Multisensory Processing in Spatial Orientation: An Inverse Probabilistic Approach , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping for anticipatory grip force modulation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Adaptation as a Process of Reoptimization , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Jeremy D Wong,et al.  Distinct Haptic Cues Do Not Reduce Interference when Learning to Reach in Multiple Force Fields , 2008, PloS one.

[11]  Karim Nader,et al.  Memory traces unbound , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Optimal integration of gravity in trajectory planning of vertical pointing movements. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  James L Patton,et al.  Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Distinct Motor Plans Form and Retrieve Distinct Motor Memories for Physically Identical Movements , 2012, Current Biology.

[18]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Gone in 0.6 Seconds: The Encoding of Motor Memories Depends on Recent Sensorimotor States , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  On the nature of the vestibular control of arm-reaching movements during whole-body rotations , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Reply — reconsolidation: The labile nature of consolidation theory , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Motor Adaptation Training for Faster Relearning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Kawato,et al.  Adaptation to Stable and Unstable Dynamics Achieved By Combined Impedance Control and Inverse Dynamics Model , 2003 .

[25]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Adaptation and generalization in acceleration-dependent force fields , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Reza Shadmehr and Steven P. Wise The computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing , 2014 .

[32]  Sarah E. Pekny,et al.  Protection and Expression of Human Motor Memories , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[35]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments? , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.