On the in situ impedance measurement with pu-probes--simulation of the measurement setup.

High-quality numerical simulations in room acoustics require a detailed knowledge of the acoustic reflection characteristics of the materials in the room, in order to realistically model the interferences between multiple sound reflections at the room boundaries. While different standardized measurement methods exist for the determination of the absorption coefficient and reflection factor these methods can generally not be applied in situ. Thus time-consuming laboratory measurements and the supply of material samples are required. Driven by the obvious demand for a reliable in situ measurement technique, a pu-probe based method has emerged during the last years, which derives the reflection factor based on the simultaneous measurement of sound pressure and velocity. However, previous investigations of the setup and publications by other authors have shown that the measurement results are affected by various uncertainty factors. The present study aims at the identification, separation, and quantitative assessment of the uncertainty factors related to reflection and diffraction effects at the loudspeaker, sensor, and the absorber geometry. Therefore, a purely simulative approach will be used that replicates the actual measurement situation in every detail, including the geometries of sensor, loudspeaker, and absorber. The simulation setup is validated by measurements and is used to systematically separate the different uncertainty factors.

[1]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Influence of various uncertainty factors on the result of beamforming measurements , 2011 .

[2]  Arcanjo Lenzi,et al.  Estimation of pressure-particle velocity impedance measurement uncertainty using the Monte Carlo method. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Jean François Allard,et al.  Measurements of acoustic impedance in a free field with two microphones and a spectrum analyzer , 1985 .

[4]  J. S. Bolton,et al.  The application of cepstral techniques to the measurement of transfer functions and acoustical reflection coefficients , 1984 .

[5]  J. F. Allard,et al.  In situ two-microphone technique for the measurement of the acoustic surface impedance of materials , 1989 .

[6]  Massimo Garai,et al.  Measurement of the sound-absorption coefficient in situ: The reflection method using periodic pseudo-random sequences of maximum length , 1993 .

[7]  Julio A. Cordioli,et al.  Estimation and minimization of errors caused by sample size effect in the measurement of the normal absorption coefficient of a locally reactive surface , 2012 .

[8]  Kazuhiro Takashima,et al.  Comparison of three measurement techniques for the normal absorption coefficient of sound absorbing materials in the free field. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  M. Tamura Spatial Fourier transform method of measuring reflection coefficients at oblique incidence. I: Theory and numerical examples , 1990 .

[10]  C. Nocke In-situ acoustic impedance measurement using a free-field transfer function method , 2000 .

[11]  E. Mommertz,et al.  Angle-dependent in-situ measurements of reflection coefficients using a subtraction technique , 1995 .

[12]  Swen Müller,et al.  Transfer-Function Measurement with Sweeps , 2001 .

[13]  Timothy M. Barry Measurement of the absorption spectrum using correlation/spectral density techniques , 1974 .

[14]  Miko Elwenspoek,et al.  The μ-flown: A novel device for measuring acoustic flows , 1996 .

[15]  Toru Otsuru,et al.  Ensemble averaged surface normal impedance of material using an in-situ technique: preliminary study using boundary element method. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Denis Lafarge,et al.  Spatial Fourier‐transform method for measuring reflection coefficients at oblique incidence. II. Experimental results , 1995 .