A Complexity Theory Model in Science Education Problem Solving: Random Walks for Working Memory and Mental Capacity

The present study examines the role of limited human channel capacity from a science education perspective. A model of science problem solving has been previously validated by applying concepts and tools of complexity theory (the working memory, random walk method). The method correlated the subjects' rank-order achievement scores in organic-synthesis chemistry problems with the subjects' working memory capacity. In this work, we apply the same nonlinear approach to a different data set, taken from chemical-equilibrium problem solving. In contrast to the organic-synthesis problems, these problems are algorithmic, require numerical calculations, and have a complex logical structure. As a result, these problems cause deviations from the model, and affect the pattern observed with the nonlinear method. In addition to Baddeley's working memory capacity, the Pascual-Leone's mental (M-) capacity is examined by the same random-walk method. As the complexity of the problem increases, the fractal dimension of the working memory random walk demonstrates a sudden drop, while the fractal dimension of the M-capacity random walk decreases in a linear fashion. A review of the basic features of the two capacities and their relation is included. The method and findings have consequences for problem solving not only in chemistry and science education, but also in other disciplines.

[1]  A. Baddeley.  The magical number seven: still magic after all these years? , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Voss,et al.  Evolution of long-range fractal correlations and 1/f noise in DNA base sequences. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[3]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Learning Difficulties in School Science‐‐Towards a Working Hypothesis , 1980 .

[4]  S. Morra,et al.  Working memory (or the M operator) and the planning of children's drawings , 1988 .

[5]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[6]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  New stars for the teacher to steer by , 1984 .

[7]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Understanding learning difficulties—A predictive research model , 1989 .

[8]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Reasoning strategies of students in solving chemistry problems as a function of developmental level, functional M‐capacity and disembedding ability , 1996 .

[9]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Manipulation of M Demand of Chemistry Problems and its Effect on Student Performance: A Neo-Piagetian Study. , 1988 .

[10]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Working Memory, Mental Capacity and Science Education: towards an understanding of the ‘working memory overload hypothesis’ , 1993 .

[11]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.

[12]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Memory Span: Sources of Individual and Developmental Differences , 1981 .

[13]  T. Shallice.  From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: Converging Operations: Specific Syndromes and Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1988 .

[14]  Mansoor Niaz.  Pascual‐Leone's Theory of Constructive Operators as an Explanatory Construct in Cognitive Development and Science Achievement , 1994 .

[15]  M. Chi.  Knowledge structures and memory development. , 1978 .

[16]  J. D. McGaugh.  Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[17]  Mansoor Niaz.  Relation between Pascual‐Leone's structural and functional M‐space and its effect on problem solving in chemistry , 1989 .

[18]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[19]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Information Processing Capacity and the Problem of Horizontal Decalage: A Demonstration Using Combinatorial Reasoning Tasks. , 1977 .

[21]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving , 1998 .

[22]  Correlates of formal operational reasoning: A neo‐piagetian analysis , 1991 .

[23]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Manipulation of logical structure of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance , 1992 .

[24]  F. Tito Arecchi,et al.  Complexity Versus Complex Systems: A New Approach to Scientific Discovery , 1999 .

[25]  J. Pascual-Leone.  ORGANISMIC PROCESSES FOR NEO‐PIAGETIAN THEORIES: A DIALECTICAL CAUSAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT , 1987 .

[26]  Juan Pascual-Leone,et al.  The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: A new experimental paradigm and a neo-Piagetian model , 1969 .

[27]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[28]  Paul Ammon,et al.  Piagetian Theory and Neo-Piagetian Analysis as Psychological Guides in Education , 1978 .

[29]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Relation between M space of students and M demand of different items of general chemistry and its interpretation based upon the neo-Piagetian theory of Pascual Leone , 1987 .

[30]  John L. Casti.  Chaos data analyzer , 1996 .

[31]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  The science of fractal images , 2011 .

[32]  A. Baddeley.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[33]  R. Logie,et al.  When working memory does not work. The role of working memory in neuropsychology. , 1993 .

[34]  Juan Pascual-Leone,et al.  A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages , 1970 .

[35]  Buford Johnson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THOUGHT , 1938 .

[36]  J. Hunt,et al.  Intelligence and experience , 1961 .

[37]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Molecular‐equilibrium problems: Manipulation of logical structure and of M‐demand, and their effect on student performance , 1998 .

[38]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  A Model of Problem Solving: Its Operation, Validity, and Usefulness in the Case of Organic-Synthesis Problems. , 2000 .

[39]  Paul S. Addison.  Fractals and Chaos , 1997 .

[40]  Mansoor Niaz.  The information‐processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual‐Leone's functional M‐capacity , 1988 .

[41]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[42]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Room for scientific thought , 1991 .

[43]  Mansoor Niaz.  The Relationship between M-Demand, Algorithms, and Problem Solving: A Neo-Piagetian Analysis. , 1989 .

[44]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Finite-size effects on long-range correlations: implications for analyzing DNA sequences. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[45]  Ichiro Tsuda,et al.  Chaotic dynamics of information processing: The “magic number seven plus-minus two” revisited , 1985 .

[46]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Academic performance in solving chemistry problems related to student working memory capacity , 1990 .

[48]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  A working memory model applied to physics problem solving , 1993 .

[49]  Barbara J. Sahakian,et al.  Boosting Working Memory , 2000, Science.

[50]  J. Haxby,et al.  Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory. , 2000, Science.

[51]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  AUDITORY IMAGERY AND WORKING MEMORY , 1992 .

[52]  Hiroyuki Nagashima.  Chaos and Fractal , 1993 .

[53]  A. Baddeley.  Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[54]  C. Scheier,et al.  Order and Pattern Formation in Psychotherapy , 1998 .

[55]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Seven plus or minus two: a commentary on capacity limitations. , 1994, Psychological review.

[56]  A. Baddeley.  Is Working Memory Working? The Fifteenth Bartlett Lecture , 1992 .

[57]  Dimitrios Stamovlasis,et al.  Application of Complexity Theory to an Information Processing Model in Science Education , 2001 .

[58]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Fractals in Science , 1995 .

[59]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Dimensional Analysis: a Neo-Piagetian evaluation of M-demand of chemistry problems , 1989 .

[60]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Balancing chemical equations: The role of developmental level and mental capacity , 1985 .