Research perspectives on serendipity and information encountering

Serendipitous discovery has been a research topic for more than one hundred years, but only recently has it been the focus of attention in library and information science (LIS). In 1960, Bernier published the first article on serendipity in a LIS journal. The number of publications gradually grew until 1990s, after which the field experienced a significant interest by the LIS researchers. Currently, LIS researchers are studying serendipity and information encountering from different perspectives, ranging from analyzing various conceptual frameworks to conducting bibliometric studies and investigating factors that trigger and affect the phenomenon. The panel of experts will discuss the issues and challenges of conducting research in this new field of study in LIS.

[1]  Charles L. Bernier.  Correlative indexes VI: Serendipity, suggestiveness, and display , 1960 .

[2]  Royston M. Roberts,et al.  Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science , 1989 .

[3]  P. Andel.  Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[4]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Information encountering : an exploration beyond information seeking , 1995 .

[5]  E. Toms,et al.  Serendipitous Information Retrieval , 2000, DELOS.

[6]  Natasha Guinan,et al.  Serendipity , 2001 .

[7]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[8]  Sandra Erdelez.  Information Encountering: It's More Than Just Bumping into Information , 2005 .

[9]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  UsingCitation Classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery , 1996, Scientometrics.

[10]  Marija Norvaisaite,et al.  Review of: Fisher, Karen E., Erdelez, Sandra, and McKechnie, Lynne E.F. Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..

[11]  Jannica Heinström.  Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition , 2006 .

[12]  Christopher K Prier,et al.  Discovery of an α-Amino C–H Arylation Reaction Using the Strategy of Accelerated Serendipity , 2011, Science.

[13]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Potential for inclusion of information encountering within information literacy models , 2011, Inf. Res..

[14]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Motifs: dominant interaction patterns in event structures of serendipity , 2011, Inf. Res..

[15]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model , 2012, J. Documentation.

[16]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation , 2012, WSDM '12.

[17]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Knowledge Discovery System for Research Hypothesis Generation from Serendipitous Findings: A Feasibility Study , 2012, AMIA.

[18]  Toine Bogers,et al.  Micro-serendipity: Meaningful Coincidences in Everyday Life Shared on Twitter , 2013 .

[19]  Mark de Rond,et al.  The structure of serendipity , 2014 .

[20]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Exploratory search in digital libraries: A preliminary examination of the use and role of interface features , 2015, ASIST.

[21]  Naresh Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour , 2015, Inf. Res..

[22]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Examination of relationships among serendipity, the environment, and individual differences , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[23]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Helen Partridge,et al.  Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing , 2016, J. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Elaine Toms,et al.  SEADE Workshop Proposal - The Serendipity Factor: Evaluating the Affordances of Digital Environments , 2016, CHIIR.