Are country and cultural values interchangeable? : a case example using occupational stress and coping

Cross-cultural research in occupational stress and coping has produced a wealth of knowledge. Although advancement has been made, there are still problems to be solved. One of these problems is the confusion generated in the literature by researchers claiming nation or country as representing cultural values, and the use of the two terms interchangeably. It remains unclear whether this practice is correct. The present paper reported on this by using 511 full time employees from Australia, Singapore and Sri Lanka to study occupational stress and coping. Results revealed that cultural value paradigm (i.e., Individualism-Collectivism) was distributed across the three nations, such that over 60% of participants across the three nations were either high or low in both I-C paradigms. The findings also indicated that the relationship between cultural value paradigm and country impacted on stress and coping differently. The study shows that significant differences exist within country, as well as between countries, such that any attempt to equate ‘culture’ with ‘country’ becomes problematic. Therefore, these findings establish that country or nation was not the same as culture values and could not be used interchangeably.

[1]  Joseph Becker,et al.  The Ways of Coping Checklist: Revision and Psychometric Properties. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  B. Parkinson.  Everyday conceptions of emotion: An introduction to the psychology, anthropology, and linguistics of emotion , 1998 .

[3]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[4]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[5]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[6]  P. Lovibond,et al.  The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. , 1995, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  Y. Lavee,et al.  The Family in Israel , 2003 .

[8]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Culture and social behaviour , 2004 .

[9]  S. Stewart,et al.  Psychological adjustment to cancer in a collective culture , 2000 .

[10]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[11]  L Eaton,et al.  Culture and Self in South Africa: Individualism-Collectivism Predictions , 2000, The Journal of social psychology.

[12]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[13]  R. Scherer,et al.  The Dimensionality of Coping Among Chinese Health Care Workers , 2000, The Journal of social psychology.

[14]  L. Slavin,et al.  Toward a multicultural model of the stress process. , 1991 .

[15]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[16]  E. Emerson,et al.  Organizational predictors of staff stress, satisfaction, and intended turnover in a service for people with multiple disabilities. , 1993, Mental retardation.

[17]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Social Psychology Across Cultures: Analysis and Perspectives , 1994 .

[18]  Kelly L. Zellars,et al.  An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process , 1999 .

[19]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. , 1994 .

[20]  S. Irvin.  Waiting: Concept Analysis , 2001 .

[21]  N. Feather.  Values and national identification: Australian evidence , 1994 .

[22]  N. Feather.  Devaluing achievement within a culture: Measuring the cultural cringe , 1993 .

[23]  S. Hunter,et al.  Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[24]  S. Jex,et al.  Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  R. K. Chiu,et al.  The Role of Affective Dispositions in Job Satisfaction and Work Strain: Comparing Collectivist and Individualist Societies , 1999 .

[27]  Maxim Voronov,et al.  The Myth of Individualism-Collectivism: A Critical Review , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[28]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[29]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. , 1990 .

[30]  P. Dewel,et al.  Examining the Nature of Work Stress: Individual Evaluations of Stressful Experiences and Coping , 1989 .