Symbolic representations in motor sequence learning

It has been shown that varying the spatial versus symbolic nature of stimulus presentation and response production, which affects stimulus-response (S-R) mapping requirements, influences the magnitude of implicit sequence learning (Koch and Hoffman, 2000). Here, we evaluated how spatial and symbolic stimuli and responses affect the neural bases of sequence learning. We selectively eliminated the spatial component of stimulus presentation (spatial vs. symbolic), response execution (manual vs. vocal), or both. Fourteen participants performed the alternating serial reaction time task under these conditions in an MRI scanner, with interleaved acquisition to allow for recording of vocal response reaction times. Nine regions of interest (ROIs) were selected to test the hypothesis that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was preferentially engaged for spatially cued conditions and cerebellum lobule HVI, crus I and II were associated with symbolically cued learning. We found that the left cerebellum lobule HVI was selectively recruited for symbolic learning and the percent signal change in this region was correlated with learning magnitude under the symbolic conditions. In contrast, the DLPFC did not exhibit selective activation for learning under spatial conditions. The inferior parietal lobule exhibited increased activation during learning regardless of the condition, supporting its role in forming an abstract representation of learned sequences. These findings reveal different brain networks that are flexibly engaged depending on the conditions of sequence learning.

[1]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  D. Howard,et al.  Implicit sequence learning: effects of level of structure, adult age, and extended practice. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[3]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  P. Strick,et al.  Cerebellum and nonmotor function. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  P. Strick,et al.  Cerebellar Loops with Motor Cortex and Prefrontal Cortex of a Nonhuman Primate , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Behavioral Context and Coherent Oscillations in the Supplementary Motor Area , 2022 .

[9]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[11]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Sequence Learning in Patients with Parkinson's Disease or Cerebellar Lesions , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  R W Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  I Koch,et al.  The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Ashe,et al.  Neural correlates of encoding and expression in implicit sequence learning , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  Similar network activated by young and old adults during the acquisition of a motor sequence , 2003, Neurobiology of Aging.

[17]  James J. Chen P-value adjustment for multiple binary endpoints , 1998 .

[18]  S. Keele,et al.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. , 2003, Psychological review.

[19]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Sequence Learning is Preserved in Individuals with Cerebellar Degeneration when the Movements are Directly Cued , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Language fMRI abnormalities associated with FOXP2 gene mutation , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Brooks,et al.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Ashe,et al.  Cerebellum Activation Associated with Performance Change but Not Motor Learning , 2002, Science.

[23]  M. Hallett,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[30]  Noriaki Hattori,et al.  Discrete parieto-frontal functional connectivity related to grasping. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Molinari,et al.  Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  M. Nissen,et al.  Implicit learning of new verbal associations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Kenji Doya,et al.  fMRI investigation of cortical and subcortical networks in the learning of abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  C. Stern,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning , 2003, Neuron.

[35]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Activation of human presupplementary motor area in learning of sequential procedures: a functional MRI study. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  H. Johansen-Berg,et al.  Distinct and overlapping functional zones in the cerebellum defined by resting state functional connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  Neural evidence of a role for spatial response selection in the learning of spatial sequences , 2009, Brain Research.

[38]  Dottie M. Clower,et al.  The Inferior Parietal Lobule Is the Target of Output from the Superior Colliculus, Hippocampus, and Cerebellum , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Activity in the supplementary motor area related to learning and performance during a sequential visuomotor task. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  A. Young,et al.  Neuropsychology of fear and loathing , 2001 .

[42]  Alexandra T Basford,et al.  Cortical control of motor sequences , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Rachael D. Seidler,et al.  Spatial and symbolic implicit sequence learning in young and older adults , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Joshua H. Balsters,et al.  Symbolic representations of action in the human cerebellum , 2008, NeuroImage.

[45]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.