Optimal Bandgap Combinations—Does Material Quality Matter?

The balance of photogeneration and recombination gives rise to an optimum bandgap for any solar cell. The radiative limit represents the lowest permissible level of recombination in a solar cell and, therefore, places an upper limit on the voltage that can be attained. Introducing additional nonradiative recombination results in a loss in voltage that can only be compensated for by moving to higher bandgaps. Consequently, the optimal bandgap for solar energy conversion will rise with increasing nonradiative recombination rate. This balance was recognized by Shockley and Queisser for single-junction solar cells and is here extended to multijunction solar cells. A rise in optimal bandgaps has been observed in simulated single-, double-, and triple-junction devices as nonradiative recombination increases. Optimal bandgaps between excellent and poor diode quality devices are shown to differ by 100s of meV under 1-sun illumination with both terrestrial and extraterrestrial spectra but exhibit no significant change at high concentration due to the dominance of the radiative component in the recombination dynamics.

[1]  J. van Deelen,et al.  HIGH EFFICIENCY THIN FILM GaAs SOLAR CELLS WITH IMPROVED RADIATION HARDNESS , 2005 .

[2]  Hiroshi Kurita,et al.  InGaP/GaAs and InGaAs mechanically-stacked triple-junction solar cells , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[3]  Sarah Kurtz,et al.  High-voltage, low-current GaInP/GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs/Ge solar cells , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[4]  Daniel J. Aiken,et al.  Development of a large area inverted metamorphic multi-junction (IMM) highly efficient AM0 solar cell , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[5]  S. Mesropian,et al.  Development of advanced space solar cells at Spectrolab , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[6]  P. Würfel,et al.  The chemical potential of radiation , 1982 .

[7]  Yasuyuki Ota,et al.  Detailed Analysis of Temperature Characteristics of an InGaP/InGaAs/Ge Triple-Junction Solar Cell , 2010 .

[8]  S. Messenger,et al.  Radiation response and injection annealing of p + n InGaP solar cells , 1998 .

[9]  J. Spann,et al.  Experimental results from performance improvement and radiation hardening of inverted metamorphic multi-junction solar cells , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[10]  Philip Chiu,et al.  42% 500X Bi‐Facial Growth Concentrator Cells , 2011 .

[11]  D. C. Law,et al.  Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells , 2011 .

[12]  A. Cornfeld,et al.  Development of a four sub-cell inverted metamorphic multi-junction (IMM) highly efficient AM0 solar cell , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[13]  M. Melloch,et al.  Assessment of MOCVD- and MBE-growth GaAs for high-efficiency solar cell applications , 1990 .

[14]  R. J. Schwartz,et al.  Estimating Saturation Current Based on Junction Temperature and Bandgap , 2011 .

[15]  Tansen Varghese,et al.  Multi-terminal dual junction InGaP2/GaAs solar cells for hybrid system , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[16]  Jerry R. Meyer,et al.  Modeling and analysis of multijunction solar cells , 2011, OPTO.

[17]  G. L. Araújo,et al.  Limiting efficiencies for photovoltaic energy conversion in multigap systems , 1996 .

[18]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Limiting efficiency for current‐constrained two‐terminal tandem cell stacks , 2002 .