New Evidence of Asymmetric Dependence Structures in International Equity Markets

Abstract A number of recent studies finds two asymmetries in dependence structures in international equity markets; specifically, dependence tends to be high in both highly volatile markets and in bear markets. In this paper, a further investigation of asymmetric dependence structures in international equity markets is performed by using the Markov switching model and copula theory. Combining these two theories enables me to model dependence structures with sufficient flexibility. Using this flexible framework, I indeed find that there are two distinct regimes in the U. S.-U. K. market. I also show that for the U. S.-U. K. market the bear regime is better described by an asymmetric copula with lower tail dependence with clear rejection of the Markov switching multivariate normal model. In addition, I show that ignorance of this further asymmetry in bear markets is very costly for risk management. Lastly, I conduct a similar analysis for other G7 countries, where I find other cases in which the use of a Markov switching multivariate normal model would be inappropriate.

[1]  M. Sklar.  Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges , 1959 .

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[3]  Marco Scarsini,et al.  On measures of concordance , 1984 .

[4]  S. Kotz,et al.  Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions , 1989 .

[5]  M. King,et al.  Transmission of Volatility between Stock Markets , 1989 .

[6]  James D. Hamilton.  A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle , 1989 .

[7]  James D. Hamilton.  Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime , 1990 .

[8]  Ronald W. Masulis,et al.  Correlations in Price Changes and Volatility Across International Stock Markets , 1990 .

[9]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Models for exceedances over high thresholds , 1990 .

[10]  F. Diebold,et al.  Regime Switching with Time-Varying Transition Probabilities , 2020, Business Cycles.

[11]  F. Longin,et al.  Is the Correlation in International Equity Returns Constant: 1960-90? , 1995 .

[12]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  Forecasting International Equity Correlations , 1994 .

[13]  Andrew J. Filardo.  Business-Cycle Phases and Their Transitional Dynamics , 1994 .

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  Do Bulls and Bears Move Across Borders? International Transmission of Stock Returns and Volatility , 1994 .

[15]  Thomas H. McCurdy,et al.  Duration-Dependent Transitions in a Markov Model of U.S. GNP Growth , 1994 .

[16]  Enrique Sentana,et al.  Volatiltiy and Links between National Stock Markets , 1990 .

[17]  A. Ledford,et al.  Statistics for near independence in multivariate extreme values , 1996 .

[18]  C. Klüppelberg,et al.  Modelling Extremal Events , 1997 .

[19]  Guojun Wu,et al.  Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity Markets , 1997 .

[20]  R. Nelsen.  An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .

[21]  Satishs Iyengar,et al.  Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts , 1998 .

[22]  Raul Susmel,et al.  Volatility and Cross Correlation Across Major Stock Markets , 1998 .

[23]  Andrew Ang,et al.  Asymmetric Correlations of Equity Portfolios , 2001 .

[24]  F. Longin,et al.  Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets , 2000 .

[25]  W. Torous,et al.  Stochastic Correlation Across International Stock Markets , 2000 .

[26]  Allan Timmermann,et al.  Business Cycle Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Evidence from Higher Order Moments and Conditional Densities , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Risk Management: Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls , 2002 .

[28]  Sanjiv Ranjan Das,et al.  Systemic Risk and International Portfolio Choice , 2002 .

[29]  Andrew Ang,et al.  International Asset Allocation With Regime Shifts , 2002 .

[30]  A. Zeevi,et al.  Beyond Correlation: Extreme Co-Movements between Financial Assets , 2002 .

[31]  R. Campbell,et al.  Increased Correlation in Bear Markets , 2002 .

[32]  Andrew J. Patton.  On the Out-of-Sample Importance of Skewness and Asymmetric Dependence for Asset Allocation , 2002 .

[33]  Y. Tse,et al.  A Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Model With Time-Varying Correlations , 2002 .

[34]  S. Rachev.  Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance , 2003 .

[35]  Wolfgang Breymann,et al.  Dependence structures for multivariate high-frequency data in finance , 2003 .

[36]  Thorsten Rheinländer.  Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond , 2003 .

[37]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Chapter 8 – Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management , 2003 .

[38]  Marcello Pericoli,et al.  A Primer on Financial Contagion , 2003 .

[39]  J. Tawn,et al.  Extreme Value Dependence in Financial Markets: Diagnostics, Models, and Financial Implications , 2004 .

[40]  Marine Carrasco,et al.  Optimal test for Markov switching , 2004 .

[41]  J. C. Rodríguez,et al.  Measuring financial contagion:a copula approach , 2007 .

[42]  Massimo Guidolin,et al.  Term Structure of Risk Under Alternative Econometric Specifications , 2004 .

[43]  Andrew J. Patton.  Modelling Asymmetric Exchange Rate Dependence , 2006 .

[44]  M. Rockinger,et al.  The Copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: An international stock market application , 2006 .