Symmetric Atlasing and Model Based Segmentation: An Application to the Hippocampus in Older Adults

In model-based segmentation, automated region identification is achieved via registration of novel data to a pre-determined model. The desired structure is typically generated via manual tracing within this model. When model-based segmentation is applied to human cortical data, problems arise if left-right comparisons are desired. The asymmetry of the human cortex requires that both left and right models of a structure be composed in order to effectively segment the desired structures. Paradoxically, defining a model in both hemi-spheres carries a likelihood of introducing bias to one of the structures. This paper describes a novel technique for creating a symmetric average model in which both hemispheres are equally represented and thus left-right comparison is possible. This work is an extension of that proposed by Guimond et al. Hippocampal segmentation is used as a test-case in a cohort of 118 normal eld-erly subjects and results are compared with expert manual tracing.

[1]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic 3‐D model‐based neuroanatomical segmentation , 1995 .

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Evaluation of Elastic Matching System for Anatomic (CT, MR) and Functional (PET) Cerebral Images , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  M Y Toh,et al.  Interactive brain atlas with the Visible Human Project data: development methods and techniques. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  A W Toga,et al.  Maps of the Brain , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[6]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Digital rat brain: A computerized atlas , 1989, Brain Research Bulletin.

[7]  T. Greitz,et al.  A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  C. Davatzikos Spatial normalization of 3D brain images using deformable models. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. Woods,et al.  Mathematical/computational challenges in creating deformable and probabilistic atlases of the human brain , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[13]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement of brain MRI lesion volume measurements in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of techniques. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  Elastically Deforming 3D Atlas to Match Anatomical Brain Images , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  A. Toga,et al.  A SURFACE-BASED TECHNIQUE FOR WARPING 3-DIMENSIONAL IMAGES OF THE BRAIN , 2000 .

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Volumetry of hippocampus and amygdala with high-resolution MRI and three-dimensional analysis software: minimizing the discrepancies between laboratories. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M. Miller,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Hippocampal Asymmetry in Schizophrenia , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-based stereotactic atlas from 250 young normal subjects , 1992 .