Dilworth's Decomposition Theorem for Posets

Dilworth's Decomposition Theorem for Posets The following theorem is due to Dilworth [8]: Let P be a partially ordered set. If the maximal number of elements in an independent subset (anti-chain) of P is k, then P is the union of k chains (cliques). In this article we formalize an elegant proof of the above theorem for finite posets by Perles [13]. The result is then used in proving the case of infinite posets following the original proof of Dilworth [8]. A dual of Dilworth's theorem also holds: a poset with maximum clique m is a union of m independent sets. The proof of this dual fact is considerably easier; we follow the proof by Mirsky [11]. Mirsky states also a corollary that a poset of r x s + 1 elements possesses a clique of size r + 1 or an independent set of size s + 1, or both. This corollary is then used to prove the result of Erdős and Szekeres [9]. Instead of using posets, we drop reflexivity and state the facts about anti-symmetric and transitive relations.

[1]  The Sum and Product of Finite Sequences of Real Numbers , 1990 .

[2]  Grzegorz Bancerek,et al.  Segments of Natural Numbers and Finite Sequences , 1990 .

[3]  G. Szekeres,et al.  A combinatorial problem in geometry , 2009 .

[4]  Parviz Jabedar-Maralani,et al.  Relative sets and rough sets , 2001 .

[5]  G. Bancerek,et al.  Ordinal Numbers , 2003 .

[6]  Kenneth Halpern August The Cardinal Numbers , 1888, Nature.

[7]  Czeslaw Bylinski Functions and Their Basic Properties , 2004 .

[8]  L. Mirsky A Dual of Dilworth's Decomposition Theorem , 1971 .

[9]  Edmund Woronowicz Relations and Their Basic Properties , 2004 .

[10]  Czeslaw Bylinski Some Basic Properties of Sets , 2004 .

[11]  Beata Padlewska,et al.  Families of Sets , 1990 .

[12]  G. Bancerek The Fundamental Properties of Natural Numbers , 1990 .

[13]  Micha A. Perles A proof of dilworth’s decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets , 1963 .

[14]  Yatsuka Nakamura,et al.  Introduction to Go-Board — Part I , 2004 .

[15]  R. P. Dilworth,et al.  A DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR PARTIALLY ORDERED SETS , 1950 .

[16]  Adam Grabowski Auxiliary and Approximating Relations1 , 2004 .

[17]  A. Trybulec Tarski Grothendieck Set Theory , 1990 .

[18]  Grzegorz Bancerek,et al.  Increasing and Continuous Ordinal Sequences , 1990 .

[19]  Czeslaw Bylinski Functions from a Set to a Set , 2004 .

[20]  D. R. Fulkerson Note on Dilworth’s decomposition theorem for partially ordered sets , 1956 .

[21]  Yatsuka Nakamura,et al.  Introduction to Go-Board - Part II , 1992 .

[22]  Grzegorz Bancerek,et al.  Directed Sets, Nets, Ideals, Filters, and Maps 1 , 1997 .

[23]  A. Trybulec Domains and Their Cartesian Products , 1990 .

[24]  Konrad Raczkowski,et al.  Equivalence Relations and Classes of Abstraction 1 , 1990 .

[25]  Grzegorz Bancerek,et al.  Sequences of Ordinal Numbers , 1990 .

[26]  Andrzej Trybulec,et al.  Tuples, Projections and Cartesian Products , 1990 .

[27]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[28]  Grzegorz Bancerek,et al.  Bounds in Posets and Relational Substructures 1 , 1997 .

[29]  Adam Grabowski Auxiliary and Approximating Relations , 2007 .

[30]  Edmund Woronowicz Relations Defined on Sets , 1990 .

[31]  A. Zalewska,et al.  Properties of Binary Relations , 1990 .

[32]  Czesław Bylí Finite Sequences and Tuples of Elements of a Non-empty Sets , 1990 .

[33]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Interval-set algebra for qualitative knowledge representation , 1993, Proceedings of ICCI'93: 5th International Conference on Computing and Information.