Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND Historically, anterior-posterior (AP) spread assessments were often used to determine the length that a distal cantilever could be extended off an implant-supported fixed full-arch prosthesis. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED The authors searched the literature for articles that used AP spread to calculate cantilever size to be constructed off implants bearing a fixed implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. RESULTS The data indicate that the relationship between AP spread and cantilever length is not linear and many influences (such as beam theory, cantilever size differences in the mandible versus maxilla, number and distribution of placed implants, prosthetic materials, and framework design) need to be considered when computing cantilever length with respect to fixed implant-supported prostheses. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Recommendations using AP spread assessments to compute cantilever lengths have not been validated by means of prospective scientific evaluations. Therefore, AP spread evaluation is just one of many issues that need to be considered when determining distal cantilever length associated with a fixed full-arch implant-bearing prosthesis.

[1]  D. M. Robinson,et al.  Implant superstructures: a comparison of ultimate failure force. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  C. Drago Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior‐Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full‐Arch, Screw‐Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[3]  A. S. von Gonten,et al.  Modifications in the design and fabrication of mandibular osseointegrated fixed prostheses frameworks. , 1995, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[4]  R. Schweitzer,et al.  Free-end pontics used on fixed partial dentures. , 1968, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  D. Lundgren,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants. , 1994, Periodontology 2000.

[7]  M. Block,et al.  Indications for splinting implant restorations. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Roger Watson,et al.  Tissue-integrated prostheses , 1985 .

[10]  A. Mine,et al.  Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[12]  C. Drago Cantilever Lengths and Anterior‐Posterior Spreads of Interim, Acrylic Resin, Full‐Arch Screw‐Retained Prostheses and Their Relationship to Prosthetic Complications , 2017, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[13]  G. Greenstein,et al.  Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  P J Becker,et al.  Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  C L Bolender,et al.  The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  S. Aquilino,et al.  Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature. Part 1. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[17]  E J Rasmussen,et al.  Alternative prosthodontic technique for tissue-integrated prostheses. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  C. English BIOMECHANICAL CONCERNS WITH FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES INVOLVING IMPLANTS , 1993, Implant dentistry.

[19]  E. S. Smyd The mechanics of dental structures. , 1952, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[20]  G Zarb,et al.  Alternative prosthodontic superstructure designs. , 1985, Swedish dental journal. Supplement.

[21]  J Gunne,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  Christoph H F Hämmerle,et al.  Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  Yoon Jeong Kim,et al.  Micro-computed tomography assessment of human alveolar bone: bone density and three-dimensional micro-architecture. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[24]  Chapman Rj Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts. , 1989 .

[25]  B Rangert,et al.  Forces and moments on Branemark implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  A D Sones Complications with osseointegrated implants. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  Ross L. Taylor Laboratory Techniques for the Branemark System , 1990 .

[28]  G H Staab,et al.  Theoretical assessment of cross sections for cantilevered implant-supported prostheses. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[29]  C. English Critical A-P spread. , 1990, The Implant Society : [periodical].

[30]  S. Aquilino,et al.  Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature, Part 2. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[31]  P. Maló,et al.  Comparison of marginal bone loss and implant success between axial and tilted implants in maxillary All‐on‐4 treatment concept rehabilitations after 5 years of follow‐up , 2017, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.

[32]  Preetinder P. Singh,et al.  Implant Supported Overdenture : A Review , 2017 .

[33]  Timothy F Kosinski Overdenture Design to Maximize Stability and Function. , 2017, Dentistry today.

[34]  A Schmitt,et al.  The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[35]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[36]  A. Çelebi,et al.  Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American , 2016, Dental press journal of orthodontics.

[37]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[38]  J. Wennström,et al.  Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[39]  N. Sudheer,et al.  Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. , 2014, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[40]  M. E. McAlarney,et al.  Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[41]  Osier Jf Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems. , 1991 .