Validation of Morphometric Analyses of Small-Intestinal Biopsy Readouts in Celiac Disease

Background Assessment of the gluten-induced small-intestinal mucosal injury remains the cornerstone of celiac disease diagnosis. Usually the injury is evaluated using grouped classifications (e.g. Marsh groups), but this is often too imprecise and ignores minor but significant changes in the mucosa. Consequently, there is a need for validated continuous variables in everyday practice and in academic and pharmacological research. Methods We studied the performance of our standard operating procedure (SOP) on 93 selected biopsy specimens from adult celiac disease patients and non-celiac disease controls. The specimens, which comprised different grades of gluten-induced mucosal injury, were evaluated by morphometric measurements. Specimens with tangential cutting resulting from poorly oriented biopsies were included. Two accredited evaluators performed the measurements in blinded fashion. The intraobserver and interobserver variations for villus height and crypt depth ratio (VH:CrD) and densities of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) were analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and intraclass correlation. Results Unevaluable biopsies according to our SOP were correctly identified. The intraobserver analysis of VH:CrD showed a mean difference of 0.087 with limits of agreement from −0.398 to 0.224; the standard deviation (SD) was 0.159. The mean difference in interobserver analysis was 0.070, limits of agreement −0.516 to 0.375, and SD 0.227. The intraclass correlation coefficient in intraobserver variation was 0.983 and that in interobserver variation 0.978. CD3+ IEL density countings in the paraffin-embedded and frozen biopsies showed SDs of 17.1% and 16.5%; the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.961 and 0.956, respectively. Conclusions Using our SOP, quantitative, reliable and reproducible morphometric results can be obtained on duodenal biopsy specimens with different grades of gluten-induced injury. Clinically significant changes were defined according to the error margins (2SD) of the analyses in VH:CrD as 0.4 and in CD3+-stained IELs as 30%.

[1]  F. Carneiro,et al.  Inaccurate haemoglobin estimation in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia. , 1995, Journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  J. Bartko Corrective Note to: “The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability” , 1974 .

[3]  M A Pollock,et al.  Method Comparison—A Different Approach , 1992, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[4]  F. Mascart,et al.  Antiendomysial and antihuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-proven European multicentre study , 2005, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Small-bowel mucosal transglutaminase 2-specific IgA deposits in coeliac disease without villous atrophy: A prospective and randomized clinical study , 2005, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Intraepithelial Lymphocytes in Celiac Disease , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[7]  Suzanne K. Lewis,et al.  Variability in small bowel histopathology reporting between different pathology practice settings: impact on the diagnosis of coeliac disease , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[8]  E. Savilahti,et al.  Morphometric Study of the Jejunal Mucosa in Various Childhood Enteropathies with Special Reference to Intraepithelial Lymphocytes , 1982, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[9]  R. A. Risdon,et al.  Quantitation of the histological changes found in small intestinal biopsy specimens from children with suspected coeliac disease , 1974, Gut.

[10]  B. Cesana,et al.  Coeliac disease: a histological follow‐up study , 2007, Histopathology.

[11]  R. Houwen,et al.  Reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of celiac disease , 2011, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  C. Hallert,et al.  High rate of gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac patients living on a gluten-free diet: controlled study , 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[13]  E. Macintyre,et al.  Distinction between coeliac disease and refractory sprue: a simple immunohistochemical method , 2000, Histopathology.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Small- bowel mucosal changes and antibody responses after low- and moderate-dose gluten challenge in celiac disease , 2011, BMC gastroenterology.

[16]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[17]  Tsung-Teh Wu,et al.  Mucosal Recovery and Mortality in Adults With Celiac Disease After Treatment With a Gluten-Free Diet , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[18]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[19]  M N Marsh,et al.  Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity ('celiac sprue'). , 1992, Gastroenterology.

[20]  L. Memeo,et al.  Duodenal histology in patients with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  L. Sollid,et al.  Novel therapies for coeliac disease , 2011, Journal of internal medicine.

[22]  V. Villanacci,et al.  Tricks of the trade: How to avoid histological pitfalls in celiac disease. , 2012, Pathology, research and practice.

[23]  G. Corazza,et al.  Coeliac disease , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[24]  G. Bhagat,et al.  Histopathology of celiac disease. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[25]  G. Corazza,et al.  Comparison of the interobserver reproducibility with different histologic criteria used in celiac disease. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[26]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Degree of damage to the small bowel and serum antibody titers correlate with clinical presentation of patients with celiac disease. , 2013, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[27]  W. Thurlbeck,et al.  The histopathologic changes of sprue and their significance. , 1960, American journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  M. Kagnoff,et al.  American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[29]  L. Bodin,et al.  Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocyte‐count revisited , 2004, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[30]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Persistent small bowel mucosal villous atrophy without symptoms in coeliac disease , 2007, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[31]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  Recent advances in the development of new treatments for celiac disease , 2012, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[32]  K. Kaukinen,et al.  iagnosing Mild Enteropathy Celiac Disease : A Randomized , Controlled linical Study , 2022 .