Performance measures for single-degree-of-freedom energy harvesters under stochastic excitation

We develop performance criteria for the objective comparison of different classes of single-degree-of-freedom oscillators under stochastic excitation. For each family of oscillators, these objective criteria take into account the maximum possible energy harvested for a given response level, which is a quantity that is directly connected to the size of the harvesting configuration. We prove that the derived criteria are invariant with respect to magnitude or temporal rescaling of the input spectrum and they depend only on the relative distribution of energy across different harmonics of the excitation. We then compare three different classes of linear and nonlinear oscillators and using stochastic analysis methods we illustrate that in all cases of excitation spectra (monochromatic, broadband, white-noise) the optimal performance of all designs cannot exceed the performance of the linear design. Subsequently, we study the robustness of this optimal performance to small perturbations of the input spectrum and illustrate the advantages of nonlinear designs relative to linear ones.

[1]  Vicenç Méndez,et al.  Stationary energy probability density of oscillators driven by a random external force. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  R. Langley.  A general mass law for broadband energy harvesting , 2014 .

[3]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Enhanced Vibrational Energy Harvesting Using Non-linear Stochastic Resonance , 2008 .

[4]  T. Sapsis,et al.  Efficiency of targeted energy transfers in coupled nonlinear oscillators associated with 1:1 resonance captures:Part II, analytical study , 2009 .

[5]  Ryan L. Harne,et al.  A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems , 2013 .

[6]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  An investigation into the simultaneous use of a resonator as an energy harvester and a vibration absorber , 2014 .

[7]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Simulating Gaussian Random Processes with Specified Spectra , 2001 .

[8]  N. G. Stephen,et al.  On energy harvesting from ambient vibration , 2006 .

[9]  Neil D. Sims,et al.  Energy harvesting from human motion and bridge vibrations: An evaluation of current nonlinear energy harvesting solutions , 2013 .

[10]  G. Kerschen,et al.  Nonlinear Targeted Energy Transfer in Mechanical and Structural Systems , 2008 .

[11]  Mohammed F. Daqaq,et al.  Transduction of a bistable inductive generator driven by white and exponentially correlated Gaussian noise , 2011 .

[12]  Neil D. Sims,et al.  Energy harvesting from the nonlinear oscillations of magnetic levitation , 2009 .

[13]  T. Sapsis,et al.  Effect of stochasticity on targeted energy transfer from a linear medium to a strongly nonlinear attachment , 2011 .

[14]  Vicenç Méndez,et al.  Efficiency of harvesting energy from colored noise by linear oscillators. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  E. Halvorsen.  Fundamental issues in nonlinear wideband-vibration energy harvesting. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Matthew P. Cartmell,et al.  An Externally Loaded Parametric Oscillator , 1994 .

[17]  Kais Atallah,et al.  The benefits of Duffing-type nonlinearities and electrical optimisation of a mono-stable energy harvester under white Gaussian excitations , 2012 .

[18]  Mohammed F. Daqaq,et al.  Response of uni-modal duffing-type harvesters to random forced excitations , 2010 .

[19]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Effective Stiffening and Damping Enhancement of Structures With Strongly Nonlinear Local Attachments study the stiffening and damping effects that local essentially nonlinear attachments , 2012 .

[20]  Kazimierz Sobczyk,et al.  Stochastic Differential Equations , 1991 .

[21]  David A W Barton,et al.  Energy harvesting from vibrations with a nonlinear oscillator , 2010 .