New views of male pelvic anatomy: Role of computer‐generated 3D images 1

There is considerable controversy concerning the role of cadaveric dissection in teaching gross anatomy and the potential of using 3D computer‐generated images to substitute for actual laboratory dissections. There are currently few high‐quality 3D virtual models of anatomy available to evaluate the utility of computer‐generated images. Existing 3D models are frequently of structures that are easily examined in three dimensions by removal from the cadaver, i.e., the heart, skull, and brain. We have focused on developing a 3D model of the pelvis, a region that is conceptually difficult and relatively inaccessible for student dissection. We feel students will benefit tremendously from 3D views of the pelvic anatomy. We generated 3D models of the male pelvic anatomy from hand‐segmented color Visible Human Male cryosection data, reconstructed and visualized by Columbia University's in‐house 3D Vesalius™ Visualizer.1 These 3D models depict the anatomy of the region in a realistic true‐to‐life color and texture. They can be used to create 3D anatomical scenes, with arbitrary complexity, where the component anatomical structures are displayed in correct 3D anatomical relationships. Moreover, a sequence of 3D scenes can be defined to simulate actual dissection. Structures can be added in a layered sequence from the bony framework to build from the “inside‐out” or disassembled much like a true laboratory dissection from the “outside‐in.” These 3D reconstructed anatomical models can provide views of the structures from new perspectives and have the potential to improve understanding of the anatomical relationships of the pelvic region (http://www.cellbiology.lsuhsc.edu/People/Faculty/Venuti_Figures/movie_index.html). Clin. Anat. 17:261–271, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Michael J. Ackerman,et al.  Technical Milestone: The visible Human Male: A Technical Report , 1996, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  J. Brooks,et al.  Male pelvic anatomy reconstructed from the visible human data set. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[3]  R. Myers,et al.  Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. , 2001, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[4]  M. Riemer,et al.  A new representation of knowledge concerning human anatomy and function , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[5]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[6]  F. Netter Atlas of Human Anatomy , 1967 .

[7]  C. Hulsebosch,et al.  Status of gross anatomy in the U.S. and Canada: Dilemma for the 21st century , 1994 .

[8]  V. Spitzer,et al.  The visible human male: a technical report. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[9]  S Halligan,et al.  Pelvic floor imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  Robert Miller,et al.  Approaches to learning spatial relationships in gross anatomy: Perspective from wider principles of learning , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  P. Walsh,et al.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy. Improved anastomosis and urinary continence. , 1990, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[12]  S C Marks,et al.  Information technology, medical education, and anatomy for the twenty‐first century , 1996, Clinical anatomy.

[13]  B. King,et al.  Anatomy of radical prostatectomy as defined by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Anne M.R. Agur,et al.  Grant's Atlas of Anatomy , 1943 .

[15]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  M Utting,et al.  What future for dissection in courses of human topographical anatomy in universities in the UK? , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  Thomas M. Oewch The Urethral Sphincter Muscle in the Male , 1980 .

[19]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Hybrid Segmentation of Anatomical Data , 2001, MICCAI.

[20]  Robert D. Acland,et al.  Color atlas of anatomy. A photographic study of the human body , 1987 .

[21]  G L Nieder,et al.  Using QuickTime virtual reality objects in computer‐assisted instruction of gross anatomy: Yorick—the VR Skull , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[22]  C Imelińska,et al.  Semi-automated color segmentation of anatomical tissue. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  W. Catalona,et al.  Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[24]  A. Shafik Levator ani muscle: new physioanatomical aspects and role in the micturition mechanism , 1999, World Journal of Urology.

[25]  C. Rosse,et al.  The potential of computerized representations of anatomy in the training of health care providers , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[26]  K. L. Moore,et al.  Clinically Oriented Anatomy , 1985 .

[27]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Hybrid segmentation of the Visible Human data , 2000 .

[28]  R. Newell Follow the royal road: the case for dissection. , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[29]  R H Whitaker,et al.  A graphic, three‐dimensional teaching model to demonstrate the topography of the human heart , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[30]  P. Walsh,et al.  Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[31]  Michael Krauthammer,et al.  Designing a Navigational Ontology for Browsing and Accessing 3D Anatomical Images , 2000, AMIA.

[32]  J R Skidmore,et al.  The case for prosection: Comment on R. L. M. newell's paper , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[33]  C. E. Dinsmore,et al.  Teaching and learning gross anatomy: Dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?” , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[34]  Wojciech Pawlina,et al.  A.D.A.M. student atlas of anatomy , 1996 .

[35]  S. Marks,et al.  The role of three‐dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[36]  J. Woolliscroft Who will teach? A fundamental challenge to medical education , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[37]  J. Camp,et al.  Puboperineales: muscular boundaries of the male urogenital hiatus in 3D from magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[38]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the Columbia experience. , 1998, The Journal of urology.