Adoption Patterns of Faculty Who Integrate Computer Technology for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.

This paper reports on research that builds and extends a diffusion of innovations framework and adopter categories in order to accurately reflect and describe faculty innovativeness with technology for teaching and learning. A World Wide Web-based survey was used to collect information from 76 faculty members from across disciplines at two major North American universities regarding technology use patterns, computer experience, use of technology for teaching, general self-efficacy, changes to teaching and learning, incentives, and barriers. Data were analyzed for the differences between early adopters and mainstream faculty, the rate of adoption of educational technology by faculty, resulting changes to the teaching and learning environment, the incentives and barriers to integrating technology, preferred methods for learning about technology, and methods for evaluating the outcomes of integration. One figure presents the continuum of innovativeness; tables present data on changes to teaching and learning, and rates of agreement with statements about changes to postsecondary teaching and leaning, incentives, and barriers to integration. Contains 27 references.

[1]  K. Sheingold,et al.  Commonalities and Distinctive Patterns in Teachers' Integration of Computers , 1993, American Journal of Education.

[2]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Innovativeness in product usage: A comparison of early adopters and early majority , 1994 .

[3]  Y. Epelboin,et al.  Information Technology: Issues for Higher Education Management , 1994 .

[4]  Greg Kearsley Teaching excellence: the foundation for technology effectiveness , 1996 .

[5]  Kenneth C. Green,et al.  The Coming Ubiquity of Information Technology. , 1996 .

[6]  Steve Gilbert An “Online” Experience: Discussion group debates why faculty use or resist technology , 1995 .

[7]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Educational technology at the crossroads: New mindsets and new directions , 1989 .

[8]  Mildred L. G. Shaw,et al.  Women, Scholarship and Information Technology: A Post-Modern Perspective , 1994 .

[9]  Philip C. Repp,et al.  Technology Precipitates Reflective Teaching: An Instructional Epiphany [and] The Evolution of a Red Square. , 1996 .

[10]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .

[11]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction , 1987 .

[12]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-based College Teaching: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1980 .

[13]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Current progress and future directions for research in instructional technology , 1989 .

[14]  Stephen C. Ehrmann,et al.  Asking the Right Questions: What Does Research Tell Us About Technology and Higher Learning? , 1995 .

[15]  John Daniel,et al.  Why Universities Need Technology Strategies , 1997 .

[16]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  A Profile of Computer Use among the University of Illinois Humanities Faculty , 1987 .