Response properties of ganglion cells in the isolated mouse retina

We have studied the organization of receptive fields of ganglion cells in the isolated mouse retina and have shown that the organization is similar to that of the cat. Based upon responses to circular and annular stimuli, most ganglion cells (90%; N = 83) had receptive fields with concentric center-surround organization, either ON or OFF center. The plot of response amplitude vs. stimulus area for these cells increased to a maximum (corresponding to a diameter of 10.0 +/- 2.8 deg S.E.M.; N = 13) and then decreased for larger stimuli, demonstrating the presence of an antagonistic surround. The dark-adapted sensitivity (205 +/- 43.8 impulses quantum-1 rod-1; mean +/- S.E.M.) did not differ from that measured for the intact preparation. We found a subset of OFF-center cells for which the dark discharge was very regular (mean coefficient of variation = 0.30). Using sinusoidal grating stimuli, we classified ganglion cells as X-like (87%) and Y-like (13%) based on spatial summation properties and the presence of subunit activity in the receptive-field center. We found no difference in the spatial-frequency preference between X-like and Y-like cells in the central retina (high cutoff frequency, 0.20 +/- 0.014 cycle/deg, mean +/- S.E.M.), in contrast to the marked difference between X cells and Y cells in the cat. Thus, ganglion cell receptive fields in the mouse retina resemble those of the cat, although the spatial characteristics of the receptive fields in the central retina are more homogeneous. This homogeneity would simplify the comparison of retinas from normal and mutant strains of the mouse.

[1]  B. Cleland,et al.  Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Absolute dark sensitivity and center size in cat retinal ganglion cells , 1978, Brain Research.

[3]  L. Peichl,et al.  Alpha and delta ganglion cells in the rat retina , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  D. Farber,et al.  Opsin, G-protein and 48-kDa protein in normal and rd mouse retinas: developmental expression of mRNAs and proteins and light/dark cycling of mRNAs. , 1988, Experimental eye research.

[5]  J. Stone,et al.  Conduction velocity as a parameter in the organisation of the afferent relay in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1971, Brain research.

[6]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[7]  H. Stieve,et al.  The effect of long-term light and dark adaptation and stimulus intensity on the receptor potential of theLimulus lateral eye , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  L. Pinto,et al.  Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus) , 1976, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Stone,et al.  Sampling properties of microelectrodes assessed in the cat's retina. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  U. Dräger,et al.  Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Spatio‐temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Y. Fukuda,et al.  Receptive-field properties of cells in the dorsal part of the albino rat's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1979, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[14]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  L. Pinto,et al.  Electrophysiology of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse: a study of a normally pigmented mouse and a congenic hypopigmentation mutant, pearl. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Receptive field properties of X and Y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements , 1982, Vision Research.

[18]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Robson,et al.  Nature of the maintained discharge of Q, X, and Y retinal ganglion cells of the cat. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  N. Mangini,et al.  Discrete visual defects in pearl mutant mice. , 1983, Science.

[22]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.