O APOIO MULTICRITÉRIO À DECISÃO COMO INSTRUMENTO DE GESTÃO DO CONHECIMENTO: UMA APLICAÇÃO À INDÚSTRIA DE REFINO DE PETRÓLEO

This article approaches the relationship between knowledge management and the use of multicriteria decision aiding methods. It presents a case study application of a multiattribute value function to the evaluation and selection of oil refining technologies. The analytical model utilized was developed based on interviews with professionals involved in the selection of technologies. That model was validated through its application to a selection process that was previously carried out. The swing weighting technique was used for the calibration of the multiattribute value function. A sensitivity analysis was also performed. The final conclusion from this article points out to the employment of multicriteria decision aiding methods as an important knowledge management tool. For this to be true these methods must be embedded in systems that would confer agility to decision making. It is recommended that additional experience must be gained with relating applications of multicriteria decision aiding to knowledge management processes.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation Using COPE and V·I·S·A , 1997 .

[3]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA , 1990 .

[4]  J. Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[5]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[7]  Jaan-Henrik Kain,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aids for sustainable water management , 2007 .

[8]  Daryl Morey Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works , 2002 .

[9]  Rex V. Brown,et al.  Rational Choice and Judgment: Decision Analysis for the Decider , 2005 .

[10]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[11]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[12]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Maut — Multiattribute Utility Theory , 2005 .

[13]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[14]  Daniel L. Schmoldt,et al.  Information and knowledge management in support of sustainable forestry: a review , 2007 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[16]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Human Systems Management: Integrating Knowledge, Management and Systems , 2005 .

[18]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Requisite Decision Modelling for Technological Projects , 1989 .

[19]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[20]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[21]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..