Least squares algorithm for region-of-interest evaluation in emission tomography

An accurate model of the nonstationary geometrical response of a camera-collimator system is discussed. The algorithm is compared to three other algorithms that are specialized for region-of-interest evaluation, as well as to the conventional method for summing the reconstructed quantity over the regions of interest. For noise-free data and for regions of accurate shape, least-squares estimates were unbiased within roundoff errors. For noisy data, estimates were still unbiased but precision worsened for regions smaller than resolution: simulating typical statistics of brain perfusion studies performed with a collimated camera, the estimated standard deviation for a 1-cm-square region was 10% with an ultra-high-resolution collimator and 7% with a low-energy all-purpose collimator. Conventional region-of-interest estimates show comparable precision but are heavily biased if filtered backprojection is used for image reconstruction. Using the conjugate-gradient iterative algorithm and the model of nonstationary geometrical response, bias of estimates decreased on increasing the number of iterations, but precision worsened, thus achieving an estimated standard deviation of more than 25% for the same 1-cm region.

[1]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  M F Kijewski,et al.  Collimator selection for SPECT brain imaging: the advantage of high resolution. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Region of Interest Issues: The Relationship between Structure and Function in the Brain , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  R. Carson A Maximum Likelihood Method for Region-of-Interest Evaluation in Emission Tomography , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Compensation for collimator divergence in SPECT using inverse Monte Carlo reconstruction , 1988 .

[7]  A. Formiconi,et al.  An analysis of the arterial input curve for technetium-99m-HMPAO: quantification of rCBF using single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Quantitative SPECT imaging: influence of object size , 1986, Nuclear medicine communications.

[9]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Compensation of spatial system response in SPECT with conjugate gradient reconstruction technique. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Basic Numerical Mathematics , 1977 .

[11]  T Greitz,et al.  Specification and Selection of Regions of Interest (ROIs) in a Computerized Brain Atlas , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[12]  J. Links,et al.  An anatomically realistic brain phantom for quantification with positron tomography , 1984 .

[13]  A. Kojima,et al.  Effect of spatial resolution on SPECT quantification values. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  MRI-PET Correlation in Three Dimensions Using a Volume-of-Interest (VOI) Atlas , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  R. Huesman,et al.  Emission computed tomography , 1979 .

[16]  D. Gilland,et al.  Implementation of simultaneous attenuation and detector response correction in SPECT , 1988 .

[17]  James M. Ortega,et al.  Iterative solution of nonlinear equations in several variables , 2014, Computer science and applied mathematics.

[18]  O. Nalcioglu,et al.  Constrained Iterative Reconstruction by the Conjugate Gradient Method , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.