Performance Limits of Compressive Sensing Channel Estimation in Dense Cloud RAN

Towards reducing the training signaling overhead in large scale and dense cloud radio access networks (CRAN), various approaches have been proposed based on the channel sparsification assumption, namely, only a small subset of the deployed remote radio heads (RRHs) are of significance to any user in the system. Motivated by the potential of compressive sensing (CS) techniques in this setting, this paper provides a rigorous description of the performance limits of many practical CS algorithms by considering the performance of the, so called, oracle estimator, which knows a priori which RRHs are of significance but not their corresponding channel values. By using tools from stochastic geometry, a closed form analytical expression of the oracle estimator performance is obtained, averaged over distribution of RRH positions and channel statistics. Apart from a bound on practical CS algorithms, the analysis provides important design insights, e.g., on how the training sequence length affects performance, and identifies the operational conditions where the channel sparsification assumption is valid. It is shown that the latter is true only in operational conditions with sufficiently large path loss exponents.

[1]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Challenges, Deployment, and Practice , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Locally Orthogonal Training Design for Cloud-RANs Based on Graph Coloring , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  M. Haenggi,et al.  Interference in Large Wireless Networks , 2009, Found. Trends Netw..

[4]  Miguel R. D. Rodrigues,et al.  On the Use of Unit-Norm Tight Frames to Improve the Average MSE Performance in Compressive Sensing Applications , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Holger Rauhut,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing , 2013, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis.

[6]  Sayandev Mukherjee Analytical Modeling of Heterogeneous Cellular Networks: Geometry, Coverage, and Capacity , 2013 .

[7]  Holger Boche,et al.  Sparse Signal Processing Concepts for Efficient 5G System Design , 2014, IEEE Access.

[8]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Recent Advances in Cloud Radio Access Networks: System Architectures, Key Techniques, and Open Issues , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Dynamic Nested Clustering for Parallel PHY-Layer Processing in Cloud-RANs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Xiao Xu,et al.  Active user detection and channel estimation in uplink CRAN systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[11]  Gerhard Wunder,et al.  Robust Iterative Interference Alignment for Cellular Networks With Limited Feedback , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Compressive channel estimation and multi-user detection in C-RAN , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[13]  Yuanming Shi,et al.  CSI overhead reduction with stochastic beamforming for cloud radio access networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[14]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  On distances in uniformly random networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Exact performance analysis of the oracle receiver for compressed sensing reconstruction , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).