Influence of gadolinium, field-strength and sequence type on quantified perfusion values in phase-resolved functional lung MRI

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influences of gadolinium-based contrast agents, field-strength and different sequences on perfusion quantification in Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI. Materials and methods Four cohorts of different subjects were imaged to analyze influences on the quantified perfusion maps: 1) at baseline and after 2 weeks to obtain the reproducibility (26 COPD patients), 2) before and after the administration of gadobutrol (11 COPD, 2 PAH and 1 asthma), 3) at 1.5T and 3T (12 healthy, 4 CF), and 4) with different acquisition sequences spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) (11 COPD, 7 healthy). Wilcoxon-signed rank test, Bland-Altman plots, voxelwise Pearson correlations, normalized histogram analyses with skewness and kurtosis and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In all cohorts, linear correlations of the perfusion values were significant with correlation coefficients of at least 0.7 considering the entire lung (P<0.01). The reproducibility cohort revealed stable results with a similar distribution. In the gadolinium cohort, the quantified perfusion increased significantly (P<0.01), and no significant change was detected in the histogram analysis. In the field-strength cohort, no significant change of the quantified perfusion was shown, but a significant increase of skewness and kurtosis at 3T (P = 0.01). In the sequence cohort, the quantified perfusion decreased significantly in the bSSFP sequence (P<0.01) together with a significant decrease of skewness and kurtosis (P = 0.02). The field-strength and sequence cohorts had differing probability distribution in the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Conclusion We observed a high susceptibility of perfusion quantification to gadolinium, field-strength or MRI sequence leading to distortion and deviation of the perfusion values. Future multicenter studies should strictly adhere to the identical study protocols to generate comparable results.