Wound healing in sarcoma‐bearing rats: Tumor effects on cutaneous and deep wounds

Many surgeons think that cancer causes a higher incidence of wound complications. Wound healing was examined in a cutaneous and deep model in control and sarcoma‐bearing rats to evaluate this concept. In a dorsal incisional wound, a significant decrease in wound breaking strength was observed from 19 days after tumor implantation onward. The amount of the breaking strength deficit increased with the size of tumor and the day post‐tumor implant. In a deeper wound chamber, hydroxyproline levels, 3H‐thymidine incorporation into DNA, histology, and collagen types were examined, and tumor produced no significant change in any parameter. The presence of tumor appeared to inhibit wound healing in cutaneous wounds but had no apparent effect on deeper wounds. This difference in healing in the two wound models is important to surgical oncologists. Because there is no demonstrable tumor‐induced healing deficit in deep wounds, cancer‐bearing organisms probably still heal these wounds normally.

[1]  M. Brennan,et al.  Gluconeogenesis in tumor-influenced hepatocytes. , 1984, Surgery.

[2]  M. Burt,et al.  Glucose metabolism and the percentage of glucose derived from alanine: response to exogenous glucose infusion in tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing rats. , 1982, Cancer research.

[3]  J. Norton,et al.  The influence of tumor-bearing on protein metabolism in the rat. , 1981, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  L. Thibault,et al.  Effects of tumor bearing and protein depletion on wound breaking strength in the rat. , 1979, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  F. Penninckx,et al.  Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Gastroenterological Surgery , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[6]  A. Greenburg,et al.  Wound dehiscence. Pathophysiology and prevention. , 1979, Archives of surgery.

[7]  T. W. James,et al.  Assay for nanogram quantities of DNA in cellular homogenates. , 1979, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  W. F. Keitzer,et al.  Abdominal wound dehiscence. , 1973, Archives of surgery.

[9]  R. Timpl,et al.  Characterization of collagen peptides by sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis. , 1971, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  T. K. Hunt,et al.  Respiratory gas tensions and pH in healing wounds. , 1967, American journal of surgery.

[11]  P. Morris,et al.  Wound dehiscence. A continuing problem in abdominal surgery. , 1966, Archives of surgery.

[12]  D. Crawford,et al.  A STANDARD MODEL FOR TENSIOMETRIC STUDIES. , 1965, The Journal of surgical research.

[13]  S. Levenson,et al.  The Healing of Rat Skin Wounds , 1965, Annals of surgery.

[14]  R. Miles,et al.  THE ETIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF ABDOMINAL WOUND DISRUPTION: AN ANALYSIS OF 177 CASES. , 1964, The American surgeon.

[15]  M. Levine,et al.  Disruption of abdominal wounds. , 1962, JAMA.

[16]  J. Schilling,et al.  Wound healing: a comparative study of the histochemical changes in granulation tissue contained in stainless steel wire mesh and polyvinyl sponge cylinders. , 1959, Surgery.

[17]  H. Lange,et al.  Abdominal wound disruption witheventration report of forty cases , 1956 .

[18]  W. L. Ross,et al.  Factors involving wound dehiscence; study of one thousand cases. , 1954, Journal of the American Medical Association.