Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND & AIMS In a population reflective of a screening setting, our aim was to compare the relative sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) colonography with double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for detection of colorectal polyps and to assess the added value of double reading at CT colonography, using endoscopy as the arbiter. METHODS This prospective, blinded study comprised 837 asymptomatic persons at higher than average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day DCBE. Examinations with polyps > or =5 mm in diameter were referred to colonoscopy. RESULTS CT colonography readers detected 56%-79% of polyps > or =10 mm in diameter. In comparison, the sensitivity at DCBE varied between 39% and 56% for the 31 polyps > or =1 cm. All of the readers detected more polyps at CT colonography than DCBE, but the difference was statistically significant for only a single reader (P = 0.02). Relative specificity for polyps > or =10 mm on a per-patient basis ranged from 96% to 99% at CT colonography, and 99%-100% at DCBE. Doubly read CT colonography detected significantly more polyps than DCBE (81% vs. 45% for polyps > or =1 cm [P = <0.01], and 72% vs. 44% for polyps 5-9 mm [P < or = 0.01]). CONCLUSIONS Double-read CT colonography is significantly more sensitive in detecting polyps than single-read double contrast barium enema. DCBE was significantly more specific than CT colonography.

[1]  G. Friedman,et al.  Effect of Fecal Occult Blood Testing on Mortality from Colorectal Cancer: A CaseControl Study , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  N. Weiss,et al.  A Case-Control Study to Evaluate Efficacy-Of Screening for Faecal Occult Blood , 1995, Journal of medical screening.

[3]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy: imaging features with colonoscopic correlation. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  G. Friedman,et al.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  A. M. Youssef,et al.  Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  C. Johnson,et al.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[8]  Y. Masutani,et al.  Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. , 2002, Radiology.

[9]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  D. Eddy,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer , 1992, The Lancet.

[11]  R Levine,et al.  Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. , 1992, American family physician.

[12]  G. Stevenson,et al.  Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  J R Hecht,et al.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K R Hoffmann,et al.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  S. Woolf,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[16]  R. Ehman,et al.  Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. , 1996, Radiology.

[17]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[18]  D. Eddy.  Screening for colorectal cancer in a high risk population , 1987 .

[19]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  S. Somers,et al.  Double-contrast barium enema studies: effect of multiple reading on perception error. , 1990, Radiology.

[21]  J. Kewenter,et al.  Double contrast barium enema and flexible rectosigmoidoscopy: A reliable diagnostic combination for detection of colorectal neoplasm , 1990, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  A. Hara,et al.  Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medical Imaging , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  B E Storer,et al.  Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. , 1999, Radiology.

[26]  G. Stevenson,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[28]  S D Wall,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[29]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Feasibility of Planar Virtual Pathology: A New Paradigm in Volume-Rendered CT Colonography , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  A. Hara.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. , 2005, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[32]  L M Schuman,et al.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  B. Flehinger,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Flexible Endoscopy and Polypectomy: A Case-Control Study of 32 702 Veterans , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  C B Begg,et al.  Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[36]  C. Johnson,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. , 2003, Radiology.

[37]  M. Macari,et al.  Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  E. Laerum,et al.  Double-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic disorders: aspects of decision-making in general practice. , 1993, Family practice.

[39]  E. Jaramillo,et al.  Comparison between double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy to investigate lower gastrointestinal bleeding , 2005, Gastrointestinal Radiology.

[40]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[41]  C. Johnson,et al.  Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[42]  S. Winawer,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Results of a mathematical model. , 1987, Gastroenterology.

[43]  C H McCollough,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[44]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy , 2005, CACM.