Extracting Electronic Health Record Data in a Practice-Based Research Network: Processes to Support Translational Research across Diverse Practice Organizations

Context: The widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) offers significant opportunities to conduct research with clinical data from patients outside traditional academic research settings. Because EHRs are designed primarily for clinical care and billing, significant challenges are inherent in the use of EHR data for clinical and translational research. Efficient processes are needed for translational researchers to overcome these challenges. The Data QUEST Coordinating Center (DQCC), which oversees Data Query Extraction Standardization Translation (Data QUEST) – a primary-care, EHR data-sharing infrastructure – created processes that guide EHR data extraction for clinical and translational research across these diverse practices. We describe these processes and their application in a case example. Case Description: The DQCC process for developing EHR data extractions not only supports researchers’ access to EHR data, but supports this access for the purpose of answering scientific questions. This process requires complex coordination across multiple domains, including the following: (1) understanding the context of EHR data; (2) creating and maintaining a governance structure to support exchange of EHR data; and (3) defining data parameters that are used in order to extract data from the EHR. We use the Northwest-Alaska Pharmacogenomics Research Network (NWA-PGRN) as a case example that focuses on pharmacogenomic discovery and clinical applications to describe the DQCC process. The NWA-PGRN collaborates with Data QUEST to explore ways to leverage primary-care EHR data to support pharmacogenomics research. Findings: Preliminary analysis on the case example shows that initial decisions about how researchers define the study population can influence study outcomes. Major Themes and Conclusions: The experience of the DQCC demonstrates that coordinating centers provide expertise in helping researchers understand the context of EHR data, create and maintain governance structures, and guide the definition of parameters for data extractions. This expertise is critical to supporting research with EHR data. Replication of these strategies through coordinating centers may lead to more efficient translational research. Investigators must also consider the impact of initial decisions in defining study groups that may potentially affect outcomes.

[1]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making a National Clinical Decision Support Infrastructure to Enable the Widespread and Consistent Practice of Genomic and Personalized Medicine , 2009 .

[2]  J. Powell,et al.  Electronic Health Records Should Support Clinical Research , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  Gina A. Keppel,et al.  Developing Governance for Federated Community-based EHR Data Sharing , 2014, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[4]  C. Friedman,et al.  Detection of Pharmacovigilance‐Related Adverse Events Using Electronic Health Records and Automated Methods , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  Carol Friedman,et al.  Enhancing Adverse Drug Event Detection in Electronic Health Records Using Molecular Structure Similarity: Application to Pancreatitis , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Richard Platt,et al.  Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs. , 2004, JAMA.

[7]  Lucy Savitz,et al.  Challenges in Using Electronic Health Record Data for CER: Experience of 4 Learning Organizations and Solutions Applied , 2013, Medical care.

[8]  G. Rust,et al.  Disparities in Primary Care EHR Adoption Rates , 2016, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[9]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research. , 2014, Health affairs.

[10]  Kari A. Stephens,et al.  LC Data QUEST: A Technical Architecture for Community Federated Clinical Data Sharing , 2012, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[11]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Electronic health records: high-quality electronic data for higher-quality clinical research. , 2007, Informatics in primary care.

[12]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  John F. Steiner,et al.  Accelerating Regulatory Progress in Multi-Institutional Research , 2014, EGEMS.

[15]  Gina A. Keppel,et al.  Implementation of a Health Data-Sharing Infrastructure Across Diverse Primary Care Organizations , 2014, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[16]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Facilitating Health Data Sharing Across Diverse Practices and Communities , 2010, Summit on translational bioinformatics.

[17]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Recommendations for the Use of Operational Electronic Health Record Data in Comparative Effectiveness Research , 2013, EGEMS.

[18]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. , 2013, Medical care.

[19]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Des Spence Data, data everywhere , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Karen J. Wernli,et al.  How the Provenance of Electronic Health Record Data Matters for Research: A Case Example Using System Mapping , 2014, EGEMS.

[22]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Shiraz I Mishra,et al.  Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. , 2006, Cancer detection and prevention.

[24]  S. Lines,et al.  Dipstick test for myoglobinuria , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[26]  Maureen Boyle,et al.  Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  H. Prokosch,et al.  Perspectives for Medical Informatics , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[28]  Douglas B. McCarthy,et al.  Learning from Health Information Exchange Technical Architecture and Implementation in Seven Beacon Communities , 2014, EGEMS.

[29]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  A Survey of Informatics Platforms That Enable Distributed Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Multi-institutional Heterogenous Clinical Data , 2012, Medical care.

[30]  S. Brunak,et al.  Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  Lisa M. Schilling,et al.  Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) Technology Infrastructure for a Distributed Data Network , 2013, EGEMS.