Description and evaluation of the Farmax Dairy Pro decision support model

Abstract Decision support models have been developed to assist management in dairy systems. This paper describes Farmax Dairy Pro (a pastoral grazing model of a dairy farm) and presents an evaluation of it using two independent farmlet studies carried out in Hamilton and Palmerston North, New Zealand with spring-calving dairy cows. Farmax Dairy Pro predicted, to a high degree of accuracy, mean annual yields (per cow and per hectare) for milk, fat, protein and milksolids (MS; fat + protein) and mean annual concentrations of MS. Monthly predictions were predicted with less accuracy than whole lactation values, but still with moderate degrees of accuracy compared with other comparable models. The general trajectory over time of yield and MS concentration was predicted well for all datasets, but in some instances the model over or under predicted the degree of variation between months. The trajectory of body condition score over time was reliably simulated in early lactation but with some discrepancies in late lactation. The model was then used to determine if it was possible to achieve 1750 kg MS/cow per ha using forages grown within the milking area for the Hamilton study. Managerial changes represented in the model, which included earlier calving dates, use of a chicory crop and additional intakes of pasture in summer, predicted increases in performance of 50–190 kg MS/ha, still at least 81 kg MS/ha short of the target level of production. Farmax Dairy Pro can be used to predict animal, farm and financial performance for different management scenarios.

[1]  M. Wastney,et al.  Evaluation of a whole-farm model for pasture-based dairy systems. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  Jennie E. Pryce,et al.  Development and evaluation of a pastoral simulation model that predicts dairy cattle performance based on animal genotype and environmental sensitivity information , 2008 .

[3]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  Quantifying the effect of thermal environment on production traits in three breeds of dairy cattle in New Zealand , 2007 .

[4]  S. Davis,et al.  The effect of level of feeding, genetic merit, body condition score and age on biological parameters of a mammary gland model. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[5]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  Short communication: Effect of environment on the expression of breed and heterosis effects for production traits. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J E Pryce,et al.  Genetics of body condition score in New Zealand dairy cows. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  Luis Orlindo Tedeschi,et al.  Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models , 2006 .

[8]  Jennie E. Pryce,et al.  Simulation modelling of dairy cattle performance based on knowledge of genotype, environment and genotype by environment interactions: current status , 2005 .

[9]  S. Garcia,et al.  Seasonality of calving in pasture-based dairy systems: its effects on herbage production, utilisation and dry matter intake , 2005 .

[10]  R. L. McCown,et al.  Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects , 2002 .

[11]  Z. Nie,et al.  Impact of pugging by dairy cows on pastures and indicators of pugging damage to pasture soil in south-western Victoria , 2001 .

[12]  S. Garcia,et al.  Effects of time of calving on the productivity of pasture‐based dairy systems: A review , 1999 .

[13]  T. N. Barry The feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) for ruminant livestock , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[14]  Denis Borenstein,et al.  Towards a practical method to validate decision support systems , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  E. Thom,et al.  Chicory for milk production , 1998 .

[16]  Lloyd A. Smith,et al.  Optimisation techniques for a computer simulation of a pastoral dairy farm , 1998 .

[17]  J. Donnelly,et al.  GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS , 1997 .

[18]  M. Freer,et al.  GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—I. Overview of the GRAZPLAN project, and a description of the MetAccess and LambAlive DSS , 1997 .

[19]  P. Cox Some issues in the design of agricultural decision support systems , 1996 .

[20]  D. Beede,et al.  Evaluation of equations based on animal factors to predict intake of lactating Holstein cows. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Parker Wj,et al.  A whole farm approach to feed planning and ration balancing using UDDER and CAMDAIRY , 1996 .

[22]  P. Dillon,et al.  The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows , 1995 .

[23]  McCall Dg,et al.  An evaluation of the Stockpol model , 1995 .

[24]  P. R. Marshall,et al.  Stockpol: A decision support model for livestock farms , 1991 .

[25]  M. Dhanoa,et al.  Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 2. Principal component and ridge regression analyses , 1990 .

[26]  M. Larcombe,et al.  UDDER: a desktop dairyfarm for extension and research. , 1990 .

[27]  B. Foran,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISIONS IN PASTORAL MANAGEMENT , 1988 .

[28]  C. W. Holmes,et al.  Milk production from pasture. , 1987 .

[29]  J. Morton,et al.  Seasonal distribution of pasture production in New Zealand , 1982 .

[30]  J. E. Radcliffe Seasonal distribution of pasture production in New Zealand , 1974 .

[31]  J. Glover,et al.  Milk production from pasture , 1961, The Journal of Agricultural Science.