Denoising and Enhancement of Mammographic Images under the Assumption of heteroscedastic Additive Noise by an Optimal subband Thresholding

Mammographic images suffer from low contrast and signal dependent noise, and a very small size of tumoral signs is not easily detected, especially for an early diagnosis of breast cancer. In this context, many methods proposed in literature fail for lack of generality. In particular, too weak assumptions on the noise model, e.g., stationary normal additive noise, and an inaccurate choice of the wavelet family that is applied, can lead to an information loss, noise emphasizing, unacceptable enhancement results, or in turn an unwanted distortion of the original image aspect. In this paper, we consider an optimal wavelet thresholding, in the context of Discrete Dyadic Wavelet Transforms, by directly relating all the parameters involved in both denoising and contrast enhancement to signal dependent noise variance (estimated by a robust algorithm) and to the size of cancer signs. Moreover, by performing a reconstruction from a zero-approximation in conjunction with a Gaussian smoothing filter, we are able to extract the background and the foreground of the image separately, as to compute suitable contrast improvement indexes. The whole procedure will be tested on high resolution X-ray mammographic images and compared with other techniques. Anyway, the visual assessment of the results by an expert radiologist will be also considered as a subjective evaluation.

[1]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Noise estimation in mammographic images for adaptive denoising , 2007 .

[2]  L. Costaridou,et al.  A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  A. Aldroubi,et al.  Wavelets in Medicine and Biology , 1997 .

[4]  Michael Unser,et al.  Wavelets in Medical Imaging , 2003, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Wavelet Threshold Estimators for Data with Correlated Noise , 1997 .

[6]  M. R. Leadbetter,et al.  Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes: Springer Series in Statistics , 1983 .

[7]  P Sprawls,et al.  Enhanced image mammography. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Li Xia,et al.  Image Denoising Based on the Dyadic Wavelet Transform and Improved Threshold , 2009, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[14]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Wavelets for contrast enhancement of digital mammography , 1995 .

[15]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Wavelet Shrinkage: Asymptopia? , 1995 .

[16]  Jian Fan,et al.  Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale analysis , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Subband Variance Computation of homoscedastic Additive Noise in Discrete Dyadic Wavelet Transform , 2008, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[18]  Ashish Khare,et al.  Soft-Thresholding for Denoising of Medical Images - a Multiresolution Approach , 2005, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[19]  Matteo Fraschini,et al.  Contrast enhancement of microcalcifications in mammograms using morphological enhancement and non-flat structuring elements , 2004, Proceedings. 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[20]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[21]  R M Rangayyan,et al.  Feature enhancement of film mammograms using fixed and adaptive neighborhoods. , 1984, Applied optics.

[22]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Adhemar Bultheel,et al.  Multiple wavelet threshold estimation by generalized cross validation for images with correlated noise , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[24]  Lena Costaridou,et al.  Medical Image Analysis Methods , 2005 .

[25]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image denoising via adjustment of wavelet coefficient magnitude correlation , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[26]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Adaptive Noise Equalization and Image Analysis in Mammography , 1993, IPMI.

[27]  J. Galambos Review: M. R. Leadbetter, Georg Lindgren and Holger Rootzen, Extremes and related properties of random sequences and processes , 1985 .

[28]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Singularity detection and processing with wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[29]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[30]  Ashish Khare,et al.  Daubechies Complex Wavelet Transform Based Multilevel Shrinkage for Deblurring of Medical Images in Presence of Noise , 2009, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[31]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[32]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet processing techniques , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[33]  Johann Drexl,et al.  Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Tien D. Bui,et al.  Image Denoising Based on Wavelet Shrinkage Using Neighbor and Level Dependency , 2009, Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolution Inf. Process..

[35]  J. Salvado,et al.  Detection of calcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet analysis and contrast enhancement , 2005, IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2005..

[36]  Kai Schneider,et al.  Nonlinear wavelet thresholding: A recursive method to determine the optimal denoising threshold , 2005 .

[37]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Optimizing wavelet transform based on supervised learning for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[38]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transform methods for object detection and recovery , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[39]  R. Wells,et al.  Smoothness Estimates for Soft-Threshold Denoising via Translation-Invariant Wavelet Transforms , 2002 .

[40]  Jacques A. de Guise,et al.  A method for modeling noise in medical images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  Xiao-Ping Zhang,et al.  Segmentation of bright targets using wavelets and adaptive thresholding , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[42]  I. Jouny,et al.  Automatic detection of malignant tumors in mammograms , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  K Doi,et al.  Digital Mammography: ROC Studies of the Effects of Pixel Size and Unsharp-Mask Filtering on the Detection of Subtle Microcalcifications , 1987 .

[44]  H. Li,et al.  Fractal modeling of mammogram and enhancement of microcalcifications , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[45]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[46]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammography , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[47]  R. Gordon,et al.  Enhancement of Mammographic Features by Optimal Adaptive Neighborhood Image Processing , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[48]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[49]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Uncertainty Modeling and Propagation Through RFVs for the Assessment of CADx Systems in Digital Mammography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.