Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China

In recent years, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for plant protection have achieved rapid development in China. In order to test and evaluate the performances of pesticides application and development status of UAVs in China, four typical UAV models were selected to test the spraying coverage, penetrability, droplets density and the work efficiency. The results showed that the deposition and spraying liquid coverage were inconsistent both in lateral and longitudinal direction. Under the condition of the similar amount of spray volume and operation parameters, the volume median diameter (VMD) of the droplet was negatively correlated with the coverage density. The failure of the UAVs for plant protection mainly took up on the blockage of nozzle, transfusion tube and the liquid pump. The failure rate of UAVs took up 3.73%-4.36% of the total working time. The operation of UAVs during ground service took up 50% of the total working time, the preparation work took up 10%, and the route planning took up around 10%, while net operation time only took up around 30%. On the whole, the high efficiency of UAV was not fully achieved; the daily operated area was not in a satisfactory level now. The spraying performances of UAVs still need further improvement. Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle, work efficiency, pesticide application, deposition, distribution DOI: 10. 25165/j.ijabe.20171004.3219 Citation: Wang S L, Song J L, He X K, Song L, Wang X N, Wang C L, et al. Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(4): 22–31.

[1]  Zhou Hongping,et al.  Design and application of electrostatic spraying system. , 2011 .

[2]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution , 2011 .

[3]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Effect of air induction nozzle (coarse droplet), air assistance and one-sided spraying of the outer tree row on spray drift in orchard spraying , 2005 .

[4]  Fernando Santos Osório,et al.  The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor networks for spraying pesticides , 2014, J. Syst. Archit..

[5]  Deng Lie,et al.  Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution , 2016 .

[6]  Zhang Huihui,et al.  Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field , 2014 .

[7]  A. Bélanger,et al.  Variability in captan residues in apples from a Canadian orchard , 2007, Food additives and contaminants.

[8]  Bhagirath S. Chauhan,et al.  Determining the uniformity and consistency of droplet size across spray drift reducing nozzles in a wind tunnel , 2015 .

[9]  Xiang-ming Xu,et al.  Variability in initial spray deposit in apple trees in space and time. , 2006, Pest management science.

[10]  Bao Rui,et al.  Droplet size distribution of aerial nozzle for plant protection in wind tunnel and flight conditions , 2016 .

[11]  Song Jianli,et al.  Influence of spraying parameters of unmanned aircraft on droplets deposition. , 2012 .

[12]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Spray Drift Mitigation with Spray Mix Adjuvants , 2008 .

[13]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Development of a Spray System for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Platform , 2009 .

[14]  Steven G. Perry,et al.  Off‐Target Deposition of Pesticides from Agricultural Aerial Spray Applications , 1996 .

[15]  Xin-Yu Xue,et al.  Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers , 2016 .

[16]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Evaluating effective swath width and droplet distribution of aerial spraying systems on M-18B and Thrush 510G airplanes , 2015 .

[17]  D. Smith Uniformity and Recovery of Broadcast Sprays Using Fan Nozzles , 1992 .

[18]  Us Agricultural,et al.  Current Status and Future Trends of Agricultural Aerial Spraying Technology in China , 2014 .