A novel task-oriented optimal design for P300-based brain–computer interfaces

Objective. The number of items of a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) should be adjustable in accordance with the requirements of the specific tasks. To address this issue, we propose a novel task-oriented optimal approach aimed at increasing the performance of general P300 BCIs with different numbers of items. Approach. First, we proposed a stimulus presentation with variable dimensions (VD) paradigm as a generalization of the conventional single-character (SC) and row-column (RC) stimulus paradigms. Furthermore, an embedding design approach was employed for any given number of items. Finally, based on the score-P model of each subject, the VD flash pattern was selected by a linear interpolation approach for a certain task. Main results. The results indicate that the optimal BCI design consistently outperforms the conventional approaches, i.e., the SC and RC paradigms. Specifically, there is significant improvement in the practical information transfer rate for a large number of items. Significance. The results suggest that the proposed optimal approach would provide useful guidance in the practical design of general P300-based BCIs.

[1]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Visual stimuli for the P300 brain–computer interface: A comparison of white/gray and green/blue flicker matrices , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Gielen,et al.  The brain–computer interface cycle , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Yang Liu,et al.  Comparison of stimulus types in visual P300 speller of brain-computer interfaces , 2010, 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10).

[4]  Urbano Nunes,et al.  Assisted navigation for a brain-actuated intelligent wheelchair , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  Sungho Jo,et al.  A Low-Cost EEG System-Based Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface for Humanoid Robot Navigation and Recognition , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  Yoshikazu Nakajima,et al.  A Two-Level Predictive Event-Related Potential-Based Brain–Computer Interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Discriminant Analysis for ERP-Based Brain-Computer Interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Impact of target probability on single-trial EEG target detection in a difficult rapid serial visual presentation task , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Sue Francis,et al.  Physiological measurements using ultra-high field fMRI: a review , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Optimizing event-related potential based brain-computer interfaces: a systematic evaluation of dynamic stopping methods. , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Luca Citi,et al.  Documenting, modelling and exploiting P300 amplitude changes due to variable target delays in Donchin's speller , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  F Babiloni,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for a gaze-independent P300-based brain-computer interface. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Control of a humanoid robot by a noninvasive brain–computer interface in humans , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Alain Rakotomamonjy,et al.  BCI Competition III: Dataset II- Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 Speller , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  A. Lenhardt,et al.  An Adaptive P300-Based Online Brain–Computer Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Towards ambulatory brain-computer interfaces: a pilot study with P300 signals , 2009, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[20]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Linear interpolation revitalized , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Andrés Úbeda,et al.  Visual evoked potential-based brain-machine interface applications to assist disabled people , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  A. Cichocki,et al.  The Changing Face of P300 BCIs: A Comparison of Stimulus Changes in a P300 BCI Involving Faces, Emotion, and Movement , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Michael Bensch,et al.  Design and Implementation of a P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Controlling an Internet Browser , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Byung Pal Yu,et al.  Correction: Inhibitory Effect of mTOR Activator MHY1485 on Autophagy: Suppression of Lysosomal Fusion , 2013, PLoS ONE.

[27]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  An adaptive P300-based control system , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  M Salvaris,et al.  Visual modifications on the P300 speller BCI paradigm , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  A self-training semi-supervised SVM algorithm and its application in an EEG-based brain computer interface speller system , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[30]  Alexander Kaplan,et al.  Adapting the P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface for Gaming: A Review , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[31]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[32]  Xiao Hu,et al.  The effects of stimulus timing features on P300 speller performance , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  Natural language processing with dynamic classification improves P300 speller accuracy and bit rate , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Jason Farquhar,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Type and of Error-Correcting Code Design on BCI Speller Performance , 2008, NIPS.

[36]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  A Noninvasive Brain-Actuated Wheelchair Based on a P300 Neurophysiological Protocol and Automated Navigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[37]  Brendan Z Allison,et al.  Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance, and preference: implications for a BCI system. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[38]  Eric W. Sellers,et al.  A general P300 brain–computer interface presentation paradigm based on performance guided constraints , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  Yael Arbel,et al.  P300 Based Brain Computer Interfaces: A Progress Report , 2009, HCI.

[40]  K. A. Colwell,et al.  Bayesian Approach to Dynamically Controlling Data Collection in P300 Spellers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  S M M Martens,et al.  Overlap and refractory effects in a brain–computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[42]  D. Hu,et al.  Gaze independent brain–computer speller with covert visual search tasks , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Control of an Internet Browser Using the P300 Event- Related Potential , 2008 .

[44]  Daniel Pérez-Marcos,et al.  Writing through a robot: a proof of concept for a brain-machine interface. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[45]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.