Characterizing Silent Users in Social Media Communities

Silent users often constitute a significant proportion of an online user-generated content system. In the context of social media such as Twitter, users can opt to be silent all or most of the time. They are often called the invisible participants or lurkers. As lurkers contribute little to the online content, existing analysis often overlooks their presence and voices. However, we argue that understanding lurkers is important in many applications such as recommender systems, targeted advertising, and social sensing. This research therefore seeks to characterize lurkers in social media and propose methods to profile them. We examine 18 weeks of tweets generated by two Twitter communities consisting of more than 110K and 114K users respectively. We find that there are many lurkers in the two communities, and the proportion of lurkers in each community changes with time.We also show that by leveraging lurkers' neighbor content, we are able to profile them with accuracy comparable to that of profiling active users. It suggests that user generated content can be utilized for profiling lurkers and lurkers in Twitter are after all not that ``invisible''.

[1]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[2]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  Readers are not free-riders: reading as a form of participation on wikipedia , 2010, CSCW '10.

[3]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Classifying latent user attributes in twitter , 2010, SMUC '10.

[4]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[5]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Knowledge Building and Motivations in Wikipedia: Participation as “Ba” , 2009 .

[6]  P. Kollock,et al.  Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities , 1996 .

[7]  Dong Nguyen,et al.  "How Old Do You Think I Am?" A Study of Language and Age in Twitter , 2013, ICWSM.

[8]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[9]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Rui Wang,et al.  Towards social user profiling: unified and discriminative influence model for inferring home locations , 2012, KDD.

[11]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[12]  Wendy Liu,et al.  Homophily and Latent Attribute Inference: Inferring Latent Attributes of Twitter Users from Neighbors , 2012, ICWSM.

[13]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[14]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  User oriented tweet ranking: a filtering approach to microblogs , 2011, CIKM '11.

[15]  N. Sadat Shami,et al.  We are all lurkers: consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service , 2010, GROUP '10.

[16]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks , 2011, WWW.

[17]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Predicting user activity level in social networks , 2013, CIKM.

[18]  Daniel Gayo-Avello,et al.  "I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper" - A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction using Twitter Data , 2012, ArXiv.

[19]  B. Nonnecke,et al.  WHY LURKERS LURK , 2001 .

[20]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[21]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Politics, sharing and emotion in microblogs , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[22]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Characterizing user behavior in online social networks , 2009, IMC '09.

[23]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Invisible participants: how cultural capital relates to lurking behavior , 2006, WWW '06.

[24]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation , 2009 .

[25]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[26]  Robert West,et al.  Drawing a data-driven portrait of Wikipedia editors , 2012, WikiSym '12.

[27]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Qualitative Examination of Topical Tweet and Retweet Practices , 2010, ICWSM.

[28]  John Hannon,et al.  Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches , 2010, RecSys '10.

[29]  David Lazer,et al.  Voices of victory: a computational focus group framework for tracking opinion shift in real time , 2013, WWW '13.

[30]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[31]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  On predicting religion labels in microblogging networks , 2014, SIGIR.

[32]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks , 2013, CHI.

[33]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Exploring User Purpose Writing Single Tweets , 2011 .

[34]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams , 2010, CSCW '10.

[35]  David Lo,et al.  Collective Churn Prediction in Social Network , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[36]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks , 2010, WSDM '10.

[37]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  Vocal Minority Versus Silent Majority: Discovering the Opionions of the Long Tail , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[38]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .