Detection of Transmitter Release from Single Living Cells Using Conducting Polymer Microelectrodes

The advent of organic electronics has made available a host of materials and devices with unique properties for interfacing with biology.1–2 One example is the use of conducting polymer coatings on metal electrodes that are implanted in the central nervous system and interface electrically with neurons, providing stimulation and recording the neuron's electrical activity.3–5 Coating a metal electrode with a conducting polymer has been shown to lower the electrical impedance and decrease the mechanical properties mismatch at the interface with tissue, with beneficial effects on the lifetime of the implant.3, 6 Conducting polymers can also be functionalized with biomolecules that stimulate neural growth and minimize the immune response to the implant.3–5, 7 Other examples are organic electronic ion pumps,8 and ion transistors,9 which are recently invented devices capable of precise delivery of neurotransmitters to neurons. These devices were recently implanted in the ear of a guinea pig and were shown to control its hearing.10 Conducting polymers such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), a material that has been shown to be biocompatible with a variety of different cells,1 have been used for these applications. These examples highlight the main advantages that organic electronic materials bring to the interface with biology, including their “soft” nature, which offers better mechanical compatibility with tissue than traditional electronic materials, and natural compatibility with mechanically flexible substrates, which paves the way for the development of implants that better conform to the non-planar shape of organs. Finally, the ability of organics to transport ionic in addition to electronic charge creates the opportunity to interface with electrically active cells in novel ways, as the work on ion pumps indicates.

[1]  C. Amatore,et al.  Comparison of apex and bottom secretion efficiency at chromaffin cells as measured by amperometry. , 2007, Biophysical chemistry.

[2]  Mohammad Reza Abidian,et al.  Multifunctional Nanobiomaterials for Neural Interfaces , 2009 .

[3]  G. Alvarez de Toledo,et al.  The exocytotic event in chromaffin cells revealed by patch amperometry , 1997, Nature.

[4]  K. Gillis,et al.  On-chip amperometric measurement of quantal catecholamine release using transparent indium tin oxide electrodes. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Robert H. Chow,et al.  Delay in vesicle fusion revealed by electrochemical monitoring of single secretory events in adrenal chromaffin cells , 1992, Nature.

[6]  C. James,et al.  An electrochemical detector array to study cell biology on the nanoscale. , 2002 .

[7]  R. Burgoyne,et al.  Common mechanisms for regulated exocytosis in the chromaffin cell and the synapse. , 1997, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[8]  Magnus Berggren,et al.  Ion bipolar junction transistors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  H. Horstmann,et al.  Docked granules, the exocytic burst, and the need for ATP hydrolysis in endocrine cells , 1995, Neuron.

[10]  J. A. Jankowski,et al.  Temporally resolved catecholamine spikes correspond to single vesicle release from individual chromaffin cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Wightman,et al.  Time course of release of catecholamines from individual vesicles during exocytosis at adrenal medullary cells. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Gordon G. Wallace,et al.  Factors influencing electrochemical release of 2,6-anthraquinone disulphonic acid from polypyrrole , 1994 .

[13]  Khajak Berberian,et al.  Electrochemical imaging of fusion pore openings by electrochemical detector arrays. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  E. Pothos,et al.  Quantitative and Statistical Analysis of the Shape of Amperometric Spikes Recorded from Two Populations of Cells , 2000, Journal of neurochemistry.

[15]  S E Moulton,et al.  Electrode-Cellular Interface , 2009, Science.

[16]  O. Inganäs,et al.  Electroactive polymers for neural interfaces , 2010 .

[17]  M. Lindau,et al.  Improved surface-patterned platinum microelectrodes for the study of exocytotic events. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  W. Reichert Indwelling Neural Implants : Strategies for Contending with the In Vivo Environment , 2007 .

[19]  M. Lindau,et al.  Secretory Vesicles Membrane Area Is Regulated in Tandem with Quantal Size in Chromaffin Cells , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Sulzer,et al.  Analysis of exocytotic events recorded by amperometry , 2005, Nature Methods.

[21]  M. Lindau,et al.  F-Actin and Myosin II Accelerate Catecholamine Release from Chromaffin Granules , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Chow,et al.  Rapid fluctuations in transmitter release from single vesicles in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[23]  R. Wightman Probing Cellular Chemistry in Biological Systems with Microelectrodes , 2006, Science.

[24]  John A. DeFranco,et al.  Orthogonal Patterning of PEDOT:PSS for Organic Electronics using Hydrofluoroether Solvents , 2009 .

[25]  M. Berggren,et al.  Organic electronics for precise delivery of neurotransmitters to modulate mammalian sensory function. , 2009, Nature materials.

[26]  M. Berggren,et al.  Electronic control of Ca2+ signalling in neuronal cells using an organic electronic ion pump. , 2007, Nature materials.

[27]  George G. Malliaras,et al.  Organic Electronics at the Interface with Biology , 2010 .

[28]  A. Kahn,et al.  Spectroscopic study on sputtered PEDOT · PSS: Role of surface PSS layer , 2006 .