Two-thirds power law in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces

Are there general rules for the generation of curvilinear motion of the end-effector? Form and kinematics of the arm trajectory are typically inter-related. A relationship between velocity and curvature of the endpoint path has been previously described and quantified as the two-thirds power law. Here we show that the two-thirds power law holds also for the foot trajectory (during the swing phase) in human locomotion for a wide range of walking speeds and gravitational loads, but air-stepping. In air-stepping, it was violated systematically. The results suggest that the power law represents a general constrain of biological motion, may be attributed to both mechanical and neural factors and can depend on natural interactions with external environment.

[1]  S. Grillner.  Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish , 1981 .

[2]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  An algorithm for the generation of curvilinear wrist motion in an arbitrary plane in three-dimensional space , 1986, Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Wing,et al.  Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three- dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Grillner,et al.  Visuomotor coordination in reaching and locomotion. , 1989, Science.

[7]  F. Lacquaniti.  Central representations of human limb movement as revealed by studies of drawing and handwriting , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Kinematic strategies and sensorimotor transformations in the wiping movements of frogs. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  W. Chapple,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the defense response in crayfish. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  P. Viviani,et al.  A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J F Soechting,et al.  Kinematics of typing: parallel control of the two hands. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  P. Viviani,et al.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Ostry,et al.  Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P Viviani,et al.  The Relationship between Curvature and Velocity in Two-Dimensional Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[17]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during lemniscate tracing. , 1999 .

[19]  S. Schaal,et al.  Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  R. Poppele,et al.  Reference frames for spinal proprioception: kinematics based or kinetics based? , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Relationship between velocity and curvature of a human locomotor trajectory , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.