Reforming the Civil Service and revising the role of the mandarin in Britain: A view from the perspective of a study of eight permanent secretaries at the Ministry of Education between 1976 and 2011

This article summarises some problems currently faced by the Civil Service and considers how the June 2012 Reform Plan would address them. It focuses on what the Plan might mean for permanent secretaries and their future role in policy making. It seeks to supplement the research on which this aspect of the Plan and its recommendations can be reviewed. For this purpose it draws on a longitudinal study of the eight permanent secretaries at the Department for Education between 1975 and 2011. All were interviewed twice along with 35 relevant others involved in the policy process in education nationally. Following a discussion of the limited literature on permanent secretaries, aspects of the background and career of the eight are examined. Given the importance of “dual leadership” to the Plan, the time in office they had with the 16 Secretaries of State they served was often short – 8 less than a year. To facilitate scrutiny of such issues an analytical framework of types is proposed varying according to how far a permanent secretary takes an active or passive part in policy. Examples of each type – making, resisting, shaping, sharing and taking – are discussed. The article concludes with suggestions for future research.

[1]  Ben Lombardi Book Review: Britain and Ireland: The Permanent Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 1854–1946 , 2014 .

[2]  Peter Barberis,et al.  The managerial imperative: Fifty years’ change in UK public administration , 2013 .

[3]  Mariana Heredia,et al.  Everyday Life in British Government , 2013 .

[4]  P. Ribbins,et al.  The permanent secretary as policy-maker, shaper, taker, sharer, and resister in education – reflections on Sir James Hamilton as a centralising outsider , 2013 .

[5]  P. Ribbins,et al.  Permanent Secretaries, Consensus and Centrism in National Policymaking in Education – Sir David Hancock and the Reform Act 1988 , 2012 .

[6]  Holly Jarman,et al.  What Whitehall? , 2010 .

[7]  F. English Understanding Leadership in Education: Life Writing and its Possibilities , 2006 .

[8]  E. Samier Educational Administration as a Historical Discipline: An Apologia Pro Vita Historia , 2006 .

[9]  Barry J. O’Toole The Ideal of Public Service: Reflections on the Higher Civil Service in Britain , 2003 .

[10]  D. Richards The Civil Service Under the Conservatives 1979-1997: Whitehall's Political Poodles? , 1997 .

[11]  P. Ribbins,et al.  Radical Educational Policies and Conservative Secretaries of State , 1997 .

[12]  P. Barberis The elite of the elite , 1996 .

[13]  P. Barberis Permanent Secretaries and Policy-Making in the 1980s , 1994 .

[14]  G. K. Fry Reforming the Civil Service: The Fulton Committee on the British Home Civil Service of 1966-1968 , 1993 .

[15]  G. K. Fry,et al.  BRITAIN'S ADMINISTRATIVE ELITE: PERMANENT SECRETARIES 1900–1986 , 1989 .

[16]  R. Rhodes THE CHANGING CIVIL SERVICE , 1989 .

[17]  A. Verrier Through the Looking Glass: British Foreign Policy in an Age of Illusions , 1983 .

[18]  G. K. Fry,et al.  Statesmen in Disguise: The Changing Role of the Administrative Class of the British Home Civil Service 1853-1966 , 1970 .

[19]  John S. Harris,et al.  The Permanent Secretaries: Britain's Top Administrators , 1966 .

[20]  LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE , 2022 .