A comparison study of radar emitter identification based on signal transients

Radar emitter identification has been studied for decades using library-based techniques that rely on pre-existing knowledge of parameters such as radio frequency (RF), pulse amplitude, pulse width, intentional pulse modulation type, or pulse repetition intervals. However, current radar emitter identification techniques will not be sufficient against cognitive radars due to their parameter agility and adaptability. In this study, five radar emitter identification fingerprints based on radar signal transients were analyzed and compared. These fingerprints include: (1) fractal dimension estimation of signal transients, (2) natural measures of signal transients, (3) polynomial regression of a signal transient energy trajectory acquired by its 4th order cumulants, (4) RF fingerprints based on the energy trajectory characteristics of signal transients, and (5) intrinsic shape of the rising edge of a pulse. The analysis and comparison were performed using K-Nearest Neighbours, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, and relative entropy over a dataset from five different radar emitters. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are highlighted. Our results show that (2), (4) and (5) achieve very competitive emitter identification performance using the selected radar datasets and classification algorithms. This study also demonstrates that the optimal emitter identification performance is dependent on the combination of RF fingerprints and classification algorithms.

[1]  Zhitao Huang,et al.  SPECIFIC EMITTER IDENTIFICATION BASED ON TRANSIENT ENERGY TRAJECTORY , 2013 .

[2]  Arnaud E. Jacquin,et al.  An introduction to fractals and their applications in electrical engineering , 1994 .

[3]  R. Gray.  Entropy and Information Theory , 1990, Springer New York.

[4]  Michel Barbeau,et al.  DETECTION OF TRANSIENT IN RADIO FREQUENCY FINGERPRINTING USING SIGNAL PHASE , 2003 .

[5]  Masashi Sugiyama,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Machine Learning , 2015 .

[6]  Kevin W. Sowerby,et al.  RF fingerprint extraction from the energy envelope of an instantaneous transient signal , 2012, 2012 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW).

[7]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[8]  Visa Koivunen,et al.  Essential Statistics and Tools for Complex Random Variables , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal processing and system theory: theoretical results and some applications , 1991, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  T. Higuchi.  Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory , 1988 .

[11]  L. E. Langley,et al.  Specific emitter identification (SEI) and classical parameter fusion technology , 1993, Proceedings of WESCON '93.

[12]  Kenneth Falconer,et al.  Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications , 1990 .

[13]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Measuring the Fractal Dimension of Signals: Morphological Covers and Iterative Optimization , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  J. Dudczyk,et al.  Identification of emitter sources in the aspect of their fractal features , 2013 .

[15]  M. J. Katz,et al.  Fractals and the analysis of waveforms. , 1988, Computers in biology and medicine.

[16]  Lu Gan,et al.  Specific Emitter Identification Based on the Natural Measure , 2017, Entropy.

[17]  Michael F. Barnsley,et al.  Fractals everywhere , 1988 .

[18]  P. Agostino Accardo,et al.  Use of the fractal dimension for the analysis of electroencephalographic time series , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.