Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution Through Sending-or-Not-Sending

Channel loss seems to be the most severe limitation on the practical application of long distance quantum key distribution. The idea of twin-field quantum key distribution can improve the key rate from the linear scale of channel loss in the traditional decoy-state method to the square root scale of the channel transmittance. However, the technical demands are rather tough because they require single photon level interference of two remote independent lasers. Here, we adopt the technology developed in the frequency and time transfer to lock two independent laser wavelengths and utilize additional phase reference light to estimate and compensate the fiber fluctuation. Further, with a single photon detector with a high detection rate, we demonstrate twin field quantum key distribution through the sending-or-not-sending protocol with a realistic phase drift over 300 km optical fiber spools. We calculate the secure key rates with the finite size effect. The secure key rate at 300 km (1.96×10^{-6}) is higher than that of the repeaterless secret key capacity (8.64×10^{-7}).

[1]  Xiongfeng Ma,et al.  Decoy state quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  L. Banchi,et al.  Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  M. Dušek,et al.  Chapter 5 - Quantum cryptography , 2006, quant-ph/0601207.

[4]  J. F. Dynes,et al.  Overcoming the rate-distance barrier of quantum key distribution without using quantum repeaters , 2018 .

[5]  Zong-Wen Yu,et al.  Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error , 2018, Physical Review A.

[6]  Marco Lucamarini,et al.  Experimental quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity , 2019, Nature Photonics.

[7]  Shuang Wang,et al.  Beating the Fundamental Rate-Distance Limit in a Proof-of-Principle Quantum Key Distribution System , 2019, Physical Review X.

[8]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Side-channel-free quantum key distribution. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[9]  S. Guha,et al.  Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[10]  Eric A. Dauler,et al.  Kinetic-inductance-limited reset time of superconducting nanowire photon counters , 2005, physics/0510238.

[11]  J. F. Dynes,et al.  Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters , 2018, Nature.

[12]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Satellite-Relayed Intercontinental Quantum Network. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[13]  Won-Young Hwang.  Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[14]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Superconducting nanowire single photon detector with on-chip bandpass filter. , 2014, Optics express.

[15]  Shigehito Miki,et al.  Stable, high-performance operation of a fiber-coupled superconducting nanowire avalanche photon detector. , 2017, Optics express.

[16]  F. Bussières,et al.  Secure Quantum Key Distribution over 421 km of Optical Fiber. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[17]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[18]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[19]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over 200 km. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  M. Curty,et al.  Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[21]  Hai Xu,et al.  qu an tph ] 2 5 Ju l 2 01 8 Sending-or-not twin-field quantum key distribution in practice , 2018 .

[22]  H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci,et al.  Quantum cryptography , 2001, quant-ph/0101098.

[23]  Xiang‐Bin Wang,et al.  Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography , 2004 .

[24]  V. Scarani,et al.  The security of practical quantum key distribution , 2008, 0802.4155.

[25]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[26]  Y.-H. Zhou,et al.  Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful , 2015, 1502.01262.

[27]  Hai Xu,et al.  Sending-or-not-sending twin-field quantum key distribution in practice , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Li Qian,et al.  Proof-of-Principle Experimental Demonstration of Twin-Field Type Quantum Key Distribution. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[29]  V. Altuzar,et al.  Atmospheric pollution profiles in Mexico City in two different seasons , 2003 .

[30]  J. Skaar,et al.  Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination , 2010, 1008.4593.

[31]  Shigehito Miki,et al.  Nonlatching Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detection with Quasi-Constant-Voltage Bias , 2012, 1211.1425.

[32]  John L. Hall,et al.  Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator , 1983 .

[33]  R. Pound,et al.  Electronic frequency stabilization of microwave oscillators. , 1946, The Review of scientific instruments.

[34]  Hui Liu,et al.  Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[35]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Large scale quantum key distribution: challenges and solutions [Invited]. , 2018, Optics express.

[36]  Yongmei Huang,et al.  Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution , 2017, Nature.